Technology giants: How the mighty have fallen
Summary: The recent death of Digital Equipment Corporation founder Ken Olsen is a reminder that it's tough to get to the top of the tech world but it's even tougher to stay there.
Image 5 of 10

Wang Laboratories always remained under the control of co-founder Dr An Wang and his family, from its inception in 1951 to the doctor's death in 1990.
The company moved from typesetting equipment to the desktop calculator business in 1965 with the LOC-2, arguably the first of such devices to handle computing logarithms, which it achieved without the use of an integrated circuit. At the start of the 1970s, though, calculators began to be commoditised, and Dr Wang moved on to what were, at the time, extremely innovative word processors. They allowed text to be edited without requiring the retyping of entire pages.
The word-processing business developed alongside minicomputers such as the Wang 2200 (pictured), which had the novel feature of a CRT monitor built into the same unit as the storage unit and keyboard. Released in 1973 and running Basic, it was in many ways an early example of the desktop computer.
Dr Wang believed his company would one day overtake his bête noire, IBM. His VS range of minicomputers went some way towards this goal in the 1980s, but, ironically, early Wang PCs suffered from their lack of compatibility with IBM's rival system. Later, IBM-compatible Wang PCs were more successful. Ultimately, though, Wang's increasingly outdated focus on word-processing and an embarrassing 'vapourware' announcement in 1983 — in which Wang promised products that had not been started or completed — led to escalating losses.
Dr Wang died in 1990, and the company turned towards industry-standard rather than proprietary software. In 1991 the company even began to resell IBM hardware. Wang Laboratories filed for bankruptcy protection the following year. It re-emerged in the mid-1990s as a network services firm rather than a computer company, and in 1999 it was bought by the Dutch firm Getronics.
Photo credit: Wikipedia
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Technology giants: How the mighty have fallen
What about CompuServe?
RE: Technology giants: How the mighty have fallen
RE: Technology giants: How the mighty have fallen
RE: Technology giants: How the mighty have fallen
RE: Technology giants: How the mighty have fallen
AOL
Yahoo
CopmpuServ
ask.com
I know for a fact that AOl and Yahoo are still here, though these are shells of what they once were, in no way on top. I haven't heard anything about Ask.com for a couple of years back when they were trying to be in direct competition with Google. Web of Trust lists ask.com as an untrusted site, but I don't know how realistic that is, considering WoT is opinion based, (and in IE9 lists igoogle as untrustworthy).
Most of these were mentioned above, but just wanted to re-list them together and try and get a handle on whether or not the blog lists dead companies or once greats
RE: Technology giants: How the mighty have fallen
Kaypro
CPM
VisiCalc
WordStar
RE: Technology giants: How the mighty have fallen
I still use WordStar for DOS or a work-alike Z.EXE that came with XTree on my tri-core AMD computer every day.
Unisys
RE: Technology giants: How the mighty have fallen
The Tandy name is still alive and well, in Australia where it is the name used for RadioShack stores.
RE: Technology giants: How the mighty have fallen
But in reality, Tandy were taken-over by Dick Smith Electronics some years ago and Dick Smith is really the major name. However, in their early days, Tandy were very important to the development of home computing in Australia.
To be more precise
RE: Technology giants: How the mighty have fallen
Case in point..., as Sun Microsystems combined its real estate holdings with Oracle, they left Menlo Park, CA, just recently acquired by Facebook. The same was true of many of Digital's campuses in the greater Boston area. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/ontheblock/detail?entry_id=39801
RE: Technology giants: How the mighty have fallen