'Piracy tax' on blank storage: Rights-holders want €36 extra on German mobiles
Summary: In Germany, representatives of the creative industries are demanding extra duties on devices that could potentially store pirated content in a move that could add euros to the cost of everything from hard disks to USB sticks
Germany's long running feud between rights-holders in the creative industries and hardware vendors has entered a new phase.
In the red corner: a number of bodies who collect revenues for Germany's publishing, music, art and photography industries that have formed the ZPUe (Zentralstelle für private Überspielungsrechte), who are pushing for a levy on blank storage media. In the blue corner: Bitkom (Bundesverband Informationswirtschaft, Telekommunikation und neue Medien or the Federal Association for Information Technology, Telecommunications and New Media) made up of technology vendors, who are opposing the duty.
The ZPUe this month asked for a levy of €7 to be placed on external hard disks of up to 1TB, and €9 for those of more than 1TB. The organisation is also demanding a duty of up to €36 per mobile phone and about €2 per USB stick, and wants all levies to apply retroactively from 2008.
The duties are necessary as such devices could potentially be used to store pirated content, the ZPUe says. The body has a duty to protect the rights of its members, and the levy on empty storage could be used to compensate rights-holders for revenues lost to piracy, according to the organisation.
Bitkom, however, believes the ZPUe's demands are exorbitant.
Very little space on hard disks is actually used to store pirated content, Bitkom says, citing research from the GfK Group.
According to GfK's research, 32 percent of Germans own an external hard disk and less than three percent of the average capacity is occupied by pirated content.
It's an argument that fails to cut any ice with ZPUe.
A spokesperson for organisation said that the market research actually strengthens the position of its members: "The German Federal Court of Law [Germany's top court] has recently ruled that it's the absolute number of pirated copies that is relevant, not the percentage of total capacity. The argument put forward by Bitkom is legally irrelevant." Three percent of an average hard disk would be 18 GB. "You can store a lot of pirated content on 18 GB."
It's not just the IT industry that have seen increased demands from the creative industries' associations: recently the music association GEMA, one of the members of ZPUe, has upped the price that restaurants and nightclubs have to pay between 400 and 2000 percent for playing recorded music. Many observers fear that this increase could effectively kill off the German party scene.
According to USB maker Transcend Information, the case is likely to be brought before the German patent office in an attempt to settle the two sides' differences peacefully. Should this approach fail, as now seems probable, a court battle lasting years could well follow.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Translation: Parasites want to suck more blood from consumers.
Why don't you go stick your head in a toilet
RIAA scum.
Uh...
Gut... Ich habe keine Raubkopien auf meine Festplatte...
let's follow this line of reasoning
And then there's the fact that they are trying to ensconce in law the fact that illegal copying will still be illegal, but someone will pay for it, which is a tacit approval and blessing for that illegal activity. Huh?
And then of course people might well be encouraged to copy even more: 'Hey, I already paid the fee on my equipment, am I not then entitled to copy the material?" And they would certainly have a point.
The whole thing is ridiculous on so many levels. Unless of course you are trying to ensconce piracy as the actual entertainment industry business model.
I think Canada already does something like this
Don't they do it in the US as well?
Photocopy paper? Toner cartridges?
The devices are already taxed
Copying of textbooks is especially widespread (at least in Europe), which is annoying on two levels. First, it motivates these taxes on devices. Second, it leads to higher prices for those of us who pay. For textbooks, I think the best solution is for publishers to come up with very convenient and reasonably priced e-books, based on a cloud model with dedicated readers, and with features aimed at students, which could kill most of the demand for pirated copies in developed countries.
Textbooks
The only reason they issue new editions is to prevent students from buying used textbooks. Even most junior-level material doesn't change. I majored in German in college and also took a lot of Spanish. Years later I took a bunch of Accounting and tax courses. 19th Century German Prose, etc., just doesn't change. The same for Introductory and Intermediate Accounting.
I personally don't like e-readers for complex material because I *have to* see it on paper for it to sink in. But that's mainly because that's how I learned and there are certain things that you can't just "learn a new way". (I'm a lawyer. Lawyers who learned to draft documents with a legal pad just can't do it with dictation or a computer. We who learned on a computer can't do it with voice recognition software or a legal pad. The "dinosaurs" who learned to dictate (actually the fastest way ...) can't do it with a legal pad or computer.)
All tech companies
Did it
This is not new.
The record companies have been going on about this since the release of the compact cassette in the early 1960s.
Not a solution
On the positive side, these taxes are very convenient. One of the most popular arguments for piracy (at least amongst people I've known who do it) is convenience. Legal downloads often have ridiculous regional restrictions and complex purchasing requirements. Within the supposed 'single market' of the EU, I've had huge headaches trying to buy digital media across borders, and can perfectly understand why people prefer to pirate (not that I agree with it). It's really ridiculous, and I think the EC should focus more on things like creating a true single market for digital media, and less on stupidity like web browser bundling (when web browsers aren't even properly products, since none of the major ones are sold).
No offense
companys over sea
they just want to get more taxs ??????????????