QLD govt considers axing IBM contract

QLD govt considers axing IBM contract

Summary: The Queensland State Government has demanded that IBM provide reasons as to why its contract at the centre of Queensland Health's disastrous payroll overhaul should not be terminated, with the state reserving its right to withhold payment on the deal and seek damages.

SHARE:

The Queensland State Government has demanded that IBM provide reasons as to why its contract at the centre of Queensland Health's disastrous payroll overhaul should not be terminated, with the state reserving its right to withhold payment on the deal and seek damages.

The state's auditor-general yesterday published a comprehensive report into the debacle, which has seen a large number of Queensland Health staff receive little or no pay in some periods since the new SAP-based payroll system was introduced in March this year, although the situation is gradually improving.

The auditor found that all concerned in the implementation — prime contractor IBM, Queensland Health itself and government shared services provider CorpTech — significantly underestimated the necessary scope of the project.

IBM logo

The Queensland State Government is considering terminating its contract with IBM and may seek damages.(IBM image by Kansir, CC2.0)

IBM had initially told the government that a "relatively small" amount of functionality would be required to implement a similar new payroll system at Queensland Health as a previous build at Queensland Housing — despite the fact that the Housing roll-out only catered for 1200 to 1300 staff, compared with Health's 78,000.

"The auditor-general's report clearly identifies failings on the part of contracted provider IBM," a statement issued by Queensland Premier Anna Bligh and Health Minister Paul Lucas yesterday said, noting the state reserved its right to withhold final payment and seek damages.

"We have sought Crown Law advice in relation to options for terminating the payroll contract with IBM and it's only fair that we seek to reserve our legal rights. The government has issued IBM a Show Cause Notice as to why the contract should not be terminated," Bligh said.

IBM defended itself in a company statement.

"As a global company with deep expertise in dealing with highly complex systems implementations, we vigorously defend the quality of the system we delivered to Queensland government," it said. Big Blue maintained it was "not responsible" for many key aspects of the payroll overhaul as confirmed in the auditor-general's report.

"We delivered within the governance structure established by Queensland Health and outlined in the auditor-general's report," the company added. "IBM has relentlessly and consistently delivered above and beyond the scope of the contract to assist Queensland Health identify and address concerns with its payroll process."

The company said its commitment to supporting the state in its mission to provide quality services to employees remained unchanged.

Topics: Government, Government AU, Health, Legal

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

2 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Another reason why it should be manditory for all Government and Financial institutions to ensure that a manditory fixed level of Permanent (and NOT CONTRACT Staff) be maintained for the duration of the Tendered Contract.

    Reject an notion that contractors be used unless they also are permanently contactually bound in the Term of the Tender.
    SAP - Never heard of any project that doesnt involve massive "variation" costs and either slowness or a lack of contractors to finish the job.
    As Myers how their new SAP is.
    Hideous62
  • I have read the AG's report and am unable to find where it "clearly identifies failings on the part of contracted provider IBM," if so it is buried or implied and not even mentioned in the Executive summary. If it was that "clear" then IBM should have been mentioned up front.I have come to learn that when Anna uses the word "clearly", which she often does, it usually means the opposite. Health's CIO has never received mention in all of this and yet he signed off on going live. What we have yet again is a politically driven implementation process under the governenance of incompetent bureaucrats who are now seeking to blame the ICT industry. My advice to IBM is to sue for defamation
    Gerald Raffe