Relaxing crowdfunding rules could help Asia startups

Relaxing crowdfunding rules could help Asia startups

Summary: Region's startups and SMBs could benefit from having access to funds offered by small-time investors to grow their businesses, but there are inherent risks for both parties to consider, observers note.

SHARE:

Crowdfunding, which allows businesses to raise money from a large pool of small-time investors in return for equity, may benefit startups and small and midsize businesses (SMBs) in Asia just as it has in markets such as the United States. It also brings with it many risks though, say industry watchers.

In April, American president Barack Obama gave his support for such initiatives when he signed the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act, which lifted restrictions on companies from selling shares to the general public via crowdfunding platforms such as Kickstarter.

Andrew Stott, partner at law firm Olswang, lauded the move and believes such funding platforms would help boost businesses and job creation in Asia too. "Given the current financial climate--[what with] banks not lending and limited access to equity capital--entrepreneurs and jobs will be stimulated by a new ease in funding," he said.

What is crowdfunding?

Crowdfunding is the concept that businesses should be able to raise money, typically online, from a large pool of individuals in return for a token gift.

Typically the stakes would be very small but in aggregate, the amount raised by the company would be sufficient for its needs.

Business advantage: A source of funding that comes without the controls and protections a more institutional financier--whether debt or equity from a venture capital firm, private equity housee or ultra high net worth individuals--would demand.

He added that "sophisticated legal jurisdictions" have been the problem preventing the raising of funds from individuals, usually non-high net worth and inexperienced investors. This is so as to "protect 'Joe Public' from exploitation", he explained.

However, in places such as Singapore where there is a great demand for investment opportunities, high net incomes and a broad and sophisticated education system, allowing people to "risk" their money investing in crowdfunding schemes would make "real sense", the lawyer pointed out.

After all, Asia as a region has a history of backing smaller businesses and attracting "family and friends" funding. "Crowdfunding would just move that into the digital age and expand marketing opportunities," said Stott.

It would also signal a shift in legislative focus, from protecting individuals and being concerned with their exploitation, to supporting SMBs and entrepreneurialism, he added.

Already, the idea of crowdfunding appears to have taken root and is growing in popularity in the region, with online sites such as Singapore-based ToGather.Asia appearing on the scene.

Another observer, Johnathan Lee, vice president of commercialization and ventures at nonprofit investment agency Cradle Fund, called on governments to further this momentum and help nurture the startup ecosystem in Asia.

"Current regulations in Malaysia do not allow crowdfunding in return for equity. If this can be allowed, it may be able to help startups and grow interest in angel investing," he said in a report in April.

Investor risks in crowdfunding
The flipside to easing regulations in soliciting funds from individuals would be that small-time investors may not be aware that the companies they invest in may not always be transparent, Stott noted. Their value of investments may fall, and they may not have access to the company's financial information as well as what the startup does with the funding, he cautioned.

"In commercial terms, the real risk of allowing individuals to invest en masse in companies that capture their fancy is that they will be left with highly illiquid stock. On an individual basis, there will be no secondary market for any small stakes acquired," the lawyer stated.

As such, the question to be considered by regulators is how far should existing laws be stretched to fully enable crowdfunding as a viable source of regular funding for SMBs and whether this would lead to exploitation, he said.

Crowdfunding not a replacement for 'smart' money
Even if rules are relaxed to allow companies to seek funds from small-time investors, they should not rush to participate in crowdfunding, said Arcot Desai Narasimhalu, director at Singapore Management University's Institute of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. This is because there are other aspects such as the insight and experience in growing businesses offered by "enlightened" venture capitalists and angel investors, he said.

"Startups need funds and crowdfunding will certainly help in some situations, but this cannot replace the 'smart' money that enlightened angels and venture capitalists (VCs) offer. The real value startups get from proven early-stage VCs is the knowhow and networks that cannot be obtained through crowdfunding alone," Narasimhalu stated.

Topics: SMBs, Banking, Legal, Start-Ups, IT Employment

About

Loves caption contests, leisurely strolls along supermarket aisles and watching How It's Made. Ryan has covered finance, politics, tech and sports for TV, radio and print. He is also co-author of best seller "Profit from the Panic". Ryan is an editor at ZDNet's Asia/Singapore office.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

1 comment
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Let the investor determine their own risk / return preferences

    Generally most governments of developing countries will put a lot of blockades to prevent the less informed investor from getting ripped off by pie-in-the-sky get-rich-quick schemes. To the point that even the genuine start-up entrepreneurs cannot find angel investors except through Government-controlled channels.

    In my opinion, to let a government agency control the start-up funding would be an oxy-moron as the government agencies are designed to reduce risk. When startups have lots of risk, but with of course high returns if it hit the jackpot.

    As a result of this, local genuine startups have to look elsewhere, such as US or UK to get fundings.
    ramzani