|
Old technology, new possibilities
Rupert Goodwins, ZDNet UK
From animal husbandry to space exploration, radio-frequency identification technology has seemingly limitless potential.
For a technology only now achieving mainstream recognition, RFID has a long history. The first practical application was developed in World War II, when a pressing need to remotely identify planes led to IFF -- Identification Friend or Foe. This embodied all the basic features of RFID: an interrogatory radio signal was picked up by the object to be identified, which then automatically replied by transmitting an identifying code.
Although civilian aviation has continually developed this technology so that aircraft can be automatically identified on radar screens together with height, speed and direction, it took a long time for it to find other uses. RFID technology is limited by the cost of the components, their ability to operate at various frequencies and the amount of power they draw; it took the development of high speed, low cost and low power silicon circuits to widen the market. High value items -- notably nuclear components -- were among the first to get their own tags, but throughout the 60s, 70s and 80s the idea spread to transportation for road tolls, manufacturing for component management through production lines, animal husbandry and security.
Tagged nuclear components
The first and still the most widespread use of RFID in the retail channel was EAS, which stands for Electronic Article Surveillance. This uses one-bit tags -- they merely respond with a simple signal saying they're present -- to trigger readers on the exit of shops, libraries and so on. However, inventory and supply chain management demands full ID for tagged items, so multi-bit RFID systems are now receiving most attention. Such tags can be read-only -- they keep the identity code given to them at manufacture -- or be read/write, which is far more flexible but has a more limited lifetime and more security concerns.
Typically, a reader sends a request transmission to a tag which replies with its identity; the reader has to distinguish between potential multiple responses when more than one tag is within range, and the system has to be set up so that the tags can be read during normal warehousing or transport. RFID systems that require major changes to existing procedures have proved difficult to implement and unreliable.
Active and passive
There are two main classes of RFID tag -- active and passive. Passive tags either have no battery -- a class called pure passive or RF powered -- or a small one that runs the electronics but doesn't power the transmitter, known as active/passive. All classes of passive tags have a short range, because they rely on the energy in the radio signal from the reader to power the transmitted reply: this is normally in the order of microwatts. However, pure passive tags have no maintenance requirement and can be made very robust, capable of surviving very high temperatures and aggressive environments -- and can also be made far more cheaply than any other sort. Even active/passive types can be made so that the battery life is the same as the natural working life of the tag.
Active tags have a battery or other power source that runs the transmitter. This lets the tag radiate much higher power radio signals, and thus increases the range significantly. Even small active tags with low capacity batteries can achieve a range of several hundred metres, and provided that the power requirements can be met, an active RFID system can have the same range as any other radio system. The record here is held by the Pioneer 10 space probe, which recently went silent after 30 years of operation. It had a nuclear-powered transponder on board that located the spacecraft at a distance of 12 billion miles from Earth. Given motivation and engineering, there is no practical limit to RFID range.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Old technology, new possibilities |
 |
Barcode replacement comes in from cold |
 |
RFID Realities |
 |
Proceed with caution |
 |
Q&A: Setting the standards |
 |
RFID Toolkit |
 |
 |
 |
 |
IBM slams RFID criticism as 'anti-retail' |
 |
Microsoft establishes RFID council |
 |
M&S extends RFID trial |
 |
RFID: BT says 'yes', survey says 'no' |
 |
BT unit adds to RFID momentum |
 |
 |
 |
 |
US military invests in 'active' RFID |
 |
Seeing past the RFID hype |
 |
RFID: An idea whose time has come |
 |
The future of radio-frequency identification |
 |
RFID tags — an intelligent barcode replacement |
 |
 |
| The next incarnation of the barcode - the radio-frequency identification tag - is attracting a lot of attention and not all of it positive. The science fiction scenario of companies or governments tracking hapless citizens via discrete slivers of silicon stashed in a new pair of trousers has got a privacy advocates truly riled. But while RFID may have some "Big Brother" potential, the reality is that most companies are yet to get their heads around the technology its most basic level - let alone hatch any Machiavellian stratagems.
That said, some proactive organisations have been quick to latch onto the potential of RFID to improve supply chains. The US Department of Defense and Wal-Mart announced recently that their suppliers must start to incorporate RFID into their systems, moves that analyst IDC claims should give the technology a significant boost. IDC expects RFID spending for the US retail supply chain to grow from $91.5m in 2003 to nearly $1.3bn in 2008. The majority of spending will come from the hardware side, which covers RFID tags, infrastructure and systems integration.
Expect more momentum around RFID later this year as vendors such as Microsoft, IBM, Sun, Oracle, BT and Phillips struggle to establish a lead in the growing market. BT recently announced the formation of a new business unit, BT Auto-ID Services, to provide services around RFID, while Microsoft has established its own RFID Council whose members include Accenture and GlobalRanger.
|
|
Talkback