Samsung, Google patent deal a good template, but...

Samsung, Google patent deal a good template, but...

Summary: Samsung and Google tout a patent cross licensing pact and argue the tech industry should follow, but the companies' symbiotic relationship almost requires such a deal on intellectual property.


Samsung and Google have inked a broad patent cross-licensing agreement that covers current intellectual property as well as whatever is cooked up over the next decade.

The companies announced that patent agreement in a blog post.

According to Google and Samsung, the patent deal allows the companies to "reduce the potential for litigation and focus instead on innovation."

That comment was a thinly-veiled dig at Apple, which has battled Samsung for years over patents.

Samsung and Google now plan to collaborate more on research and development as well as future products. The cross-licensing pact combines the No. 2 U.S. patent holder (Samsung) in 2013 with Google at No. 11, according to IFI Claims Patent Services.

Dr. Seungho Ahn, head of Samsung's intellectual property center, said the deal was "highly significant" for the tech industry. Google and Samsung are now showing the industry that there "is more to gain from cooperating than engaging in unnecessary patent disputes."

Ahn has a point---to a degree. Of course, if the entire tech industry crafted similar deals instead of going to court the intellectual property world would be a better place. In that regard, Samsung and Google offer a decent template to follow.

But there are a few unique conditions that are in place between Google and Samsung that make a 10-year patent pact worthwhile. Consider:

  • Google needs Samsung because it's the biggest Android smartphone and tablet maker. Without Samsung, Google's Android team looks like a football team stocked with weaklings. And yes I'm including Google's Motorola Mobility on the Android junior varsity at best.
  • Samsung needs Google because despite efforts to make its own name in software and cook up neat applications it still needs Android underneath.
  • The two companies are symbiotic. Samsung and Google may just be the next-generation version of Microsoft and Intel. Unfortunately, Samoogle or Googsung doesn't roll off the tongue like Wintel does. 
  • Samsung and Google have a mutual frenemy: Apple.

In other words, Google and Samsung are showing that there's far more to gain for the companies if they collaborate. That template may not fit everywhere---nor should it.

Topics: Mobility, Google, Patents, Samsung

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • I hope this mean multi-window comes to stock Android!

    It's Samsung's killer Android feature and should be standard.
  • SamGoogle, bigger than Wintel

    The best thing that happen for end users was the open standard brought to us by Microsoft and Intel. All end users benefited, and numerous players profited. Great things happen through collaboration and now some of the best minds on the globe will openly collaborate. It is no longer just a U.S. West Coast thing. Law suites lead nowhere other than dead ends for everyone but the lawyers. Wouldn't it be great of more of the industry leaders followed? They would all profit. Can you imagine SamMacGoogleWindows?
  • I always thought Winatel held back the industry by 5-10 years.

    It is simple minded to say "all end users" benefited when that is far from true. I still remember the anemic graphics the IBM debuted with at the time (for its price). There was some amazing systems and innovation out there that were killed by WinTel that took 5-10 years before they were "rediscovered".

    It is good that Google is finally seeing cross licensing as a good thing given Apple has cross licensing agreements with most major tech companies outside Google and Samsung. Hopefully Google and Samsung will get on the ball and follow through.
    • I believe that's more an excuse, as opposed to anything else.

      it's easy for a company to blame their own failures on "outside influences that held us back". It's also an "easy way" to try and devalue the accomplishments of the other company

      I feel Wintel IS the reason we both have computers here today, and for a price we can easily afford.
  • Great to see ...

    ... how grown-up companies could, and should, do business together.

    Take note Apple, next time you throw your toys out of the pram just because someone is more successful than you!
  • Good template?

    This may be a good template for companies that feel like their backs are against the wall, as they fight dozens of companies who's patents they obviously violated. The question is no longer if they will lose, but how many 10s of billions it will cost them in damages and long term royalties.