Has FOSS lost the battle against patents
Software patents are a fact of life. Their abolition isn't achievable, writes the author of the FOSSPatents blog.
Software patents are a fact of life. Their abolition isn't achievable, writes the author of the FOSSPatents blog.
That legal strategy might have worked under GPLv3 but that license has not been accepted by the industry specifically because of that patent clause.
The license options Google offers Code users by default do not include the AGPL, which it now loudly claims to support. Codeplex does something similar.
Something tells me users are going to be learning some interesting Italian gestures to use in reference to their software. You know which ones.
VMOps, a two year old cloud software company which lets companies create the equivalent of the Amazon Elastic Computing service (EC2) with commodity hardware, is rebranding itself as Cloud.Com.
It's Google's world, open source just lives in it. If Google were seeking to aggressively capitalize on its advantages, the pushback would be fiercer and everyone's growth, including Google's, slower.
Civil law is there to help prevent the injustice of having your love and support sold out. A refusal to consider protecting the rights of the weaker party tends to confirm an intent to exploit.
GPLv3 is about 3 times longer, is full of technical details, is complex (even for a lawyer) and as it is officially valid in English only it may not be the most persuasive license for a German or French administration.
Would Facebook have overtaken MySpace had Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. not bought its parent company, Intermix, in 2005, with a prediction that MySpace would drive traffic to other Fox sites.
Alfresco's agonistes, which is common with all enterprise open source companies, is maintaining open source credibility while bringing in enough cash to keep the doors open.