SkySQL goes after Oracle MySQL with enterprise release

SkySQL goes after Oracle MySQL with enterprise release

Summary: The battle's on. SkySQL, armed with the MariaDB MySQL clone, is going after Oracle's MySQL customers.

SHARE:

SkySQL, the MariaDB MySQL fork company, isn't just for open-source database management system (DBMS) experts anymore. With the release of its MariaDB Enterprise product, SkySQL is going straight for Oracle's MySQL enterprise customers.

SkySQL-logo

MariaDB Enterprise is built on top of open-source MariaDB Server and Galera Cluster software. It enables users to provision a cluster of separate database servers in minutes. MySQL claims that, MariaDB Enterprise helps "users manage and monitor their clustered database resources with an intuitive dashboard."

Matt Aslett, 451 Research's  Research Director for Data Management and Analytics, said in a statement that, "We are seeing growing adoption of both MariaDB as a drop-in replacement for MySQL, as well as Galera Cluster's synchronous replication capabilities. With MariaDB Enterprise, SkySQL gives MariaDB and Galera adopters the confidence of commercial support as well as monitoring and management functionality, without compromising the commitment to open source."

Aslett's right. Not that long ago, MySQL, acquired by Oracle as part of its Sun buyout, was the open-source DBMS. Heck, the LAMP software stack that powers most of the Internet Websites stands for Linux, Apache, MySQL, Perl/PHP/Python.

Things have changed.

Google has replaced MySQL with MariaDB for some of its work. Red Hat is making MariaDB its default DBMS. The other major business Linux distribution, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES), is also expected to switch to MariaDB.

The real key to MariaDB replacing MySQL is in Aslett's phrase, "confidence of commercial support." It's one thing for Linux and DBMS experts to pull out MySQL and put MariaDB in its place, it's another for companies that just want a fast, reliable DBMS with technical support. While technically using MariaDB instead of MySQL isn't a big deal, companies need to know that they can have the corporate backup and support they need to base their businesses on MariaDB. That's what SkySQL is giving them now.

To be exact, "MariaDB Enterprise is sold as a renewable one year subscription, which includes up to 24x7 coverage, all maintenance updates and patches, and quick access to the experienced support team at SkySQL."

This first release isn't for everyone. In the MariaDB Enterprise FAQ, SkySQL states, "The first release of MariaDB Enterprise has a very specific focus on simplifying the deployment and management of high availability [HA] clusters. It includes a set of management tools and an [application programming interface (API)] with which you can easily provision, monitor, and manage a cluster of MariaDB server nodes configured to use the high availability Galera library for multi-master, synchronous replication.

In short, for now MariaDB Enterprise is a service offering for data-centers, not just say a few Web front-end servers.

The pricing reflects this as well. "MariaDB Enterprise is offered on a per-server yearly subscription basis. Because this is a product designed to deliver high availability through replication, your database cluster must have a minimum of 3 nodes. Thus, pricing for a MariaDB Enterprise Subscription starts at 3 systems for 15,000€ or $19,500." There's also other subscription options, but you'll need to contact SkySQL's sales team for details.

Sound expensive? Have you priced Oracle's HA options recently? SkySQL's making no bones about it. They want your Oracle HA MySQL business and they'll make it worth your time to switch.

Look out Oracle, the MariaDB vs. MySQL enterprise DBMS fight is on.

Related Stories:

Topics: Enterprise Software, Data Centers, Data Management, Linux, Open Source, Oracle

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

5 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Inertia will ensure Oracle wins

    If a company is already using Oracle, forget migrating just because it costs less, maybe.

    If it's a publically traded company, the cost of migration will wipe out any savings for years to come.

    Just isn't worth migrating for companies already using Oracle.

    A company just starting out is another matter. Not too many of those these days, as the economy is soooooooo stellar these days.
    Cynical99
  • I doubt many people who were willing to pay Oracle's pricing would...

    ...be interested in switching away from Oracle. Like it or not Oracle is a huge company with a proven track record in databases. People willing to pay their prices tend to do so because they want the support of a company like Oracle.
    ye
  • Oracle will be irrelevant

    Oracle will be an increasingly irrelevant technology over the next 10 years with the only companies using it (and SAP) only doing so because of the investment and tie in to the product.

    The future will increasingly (for new companies) be about purchasing best in class services (probably delivered via cloud subscription), not restrictive modules to a cumbersome ERP that is trapped in 2003 and needs an army of people and consultants to maintain and exploit.

    The way I see it, Oracle is a bit like bitcoin. The writing is on the wall, both are false economies and both will fail.

    I work in an IT department struggling with the limitations of Oracle, be it 2 year projects that never seem to quite deliver or users that are continually needing support... this is not good business.
    londan
    • blanket predictions of doom rarely come true

      People that despise the big companies and claim that they'll be gone or at least irrelevant in coming years don't have a grip on reality. They got big because they did something right that people or companies were willing to pay for, and Oracle is no different.

      Even the predictions that MS could be broke by now haven't come true. MS even withstood Balmer and is still running strong (look at the financial statements, if you are capable of understanding them)

      Those that blind themselves will never see.
      Cynical99
    • Oracle is hardly irrelevant.

      Quote: "The way I see it, Oracle is a bit like bitcoin. The writing is on the wall, both are false economies and both will fail."
      ---

      On its face, your statement has got to be born of ignorant bliss. Bitcoin, your going to compare Oracle to bitcoin?

      I work for a large Healthcare organization, and while we no longer have any Oracle products in our datacenter, that is only because the technology decisions we made required us to take another path.

      In fact, it was a really difficult decision between the two strategic directions, one of which would had an Oracle backbone, and the other would take us in a different direction.

      While I whole heatedly agree that bitcoin will fade into the realms of Wikipedia history, our CIO and board's decisions certainly were not based on some idea that they saw parity between the fate's of Oracle and bitcoin.
      Raid60