I think this article could do with some editing - it's long-winded, meandering, unfocused. It makes off-the-cuff claims without supporting information / data, and takes a long convoluted route around the central question.
There's even a paragraph with an unfinished sentence:
"But this inherently leaves a void for news-hungry and ever increasingly competing news services, for which a decentralised ad-hoc network of citizen journalists chipping in if and when they encounter a notable event can often"
Appreciate the effort - just hoping for more quality / insight.
@jikche
Discussion on:
Message 2 of 1
The best of ZDNet, delivered
ZDNet Newsletters
Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox
