Reply to Message

Ole Man 1st Feb 2007

On the gear to force adoption of Vista and
usurp control of the internet, while calling
it an improvement for the benefit of those
like andrej770 who suck up anything
Microsoft lays out and praise them for it.

The questions ARE the ANSWERS:
"What's the justification? Doesn't this
make it harder for Web designers to create
HTML email messages–and harder for Outlook
users to receive well-designed messages?"
THERE'S YOUR ANSWER.

To assist in forcing the adoption of Outlook
2007:
"While there are some HTML and CSS
attributes that aren’t currently supported
by Word’s rendering engine, the capabilities
that our customers most wanted for their
HTML newsletters are supported by Outlook
2007."

Of course poor Andre and his compadres can't
(or won't) even read the lines, let alone
read between the lines.

http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-3513_7-6689143-1.html?tag=nl.e501

http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/175801

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070128-8717.html

http://news.com.com/2100-1001-268889.html

http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:l-289LwmxrMJ:www.cyber.com.au/about/comparing_the_gpl_to_eula.pdf+Open+Source+and+Microsoft+license+comparison&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=27

http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html