The problem is that the Bloatfarm architecture is inherently unsafe and leaky. It was designed that way to obtain "buy-in" back when MS had world dominance in its sights.
When it turned out that Windows and every MS app was, from a security standpoint, like a leaky sieve, SURPRISE! security became an issue.
So, the evil, wretched, dungheap Bloatfarm tried to do what it does best, shove the problem off on someone else: get others to shoulder the burden.
The Bloatfarm builds inherently risky software and then gets others to reduce the risk (as a public service, mind you) while it captures the profits.
Sounds very cynical does it not?
It is exactly how the dungheap has always operated.
Discussion on:
Message 11 of 1
IBM Sponsored Resources
Resources from our Sponsor
- Oracle Exadata vs IBM: Netezza Compared
- Forrester TEI Report
- CIA Whitepaper
- Harnessing the Power of Advanced Analytics
- Tapping into Unleashed Business Potential with Advanced Analytics
- Unlock Analytic Performance with Revolution R for Enterprise and IBM: Netezza Data Warehouse Appliance
The best of ZDNet, delivered
ZDNet Newsletters
Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox
