Reply to Message

Unpaid Quality Assurance for the Bloatfarm?

Jeremy W 4th Dec 2007

The problem is that the Bloatfarm architecture is inherently unsafe and leaky. It was designed that way to obtain "buy-in" back when MS had world dominance in its sights.

When it turned out that Windows and every MS app was, from a security standpoint, like a leaky sieve, SURPRISE! security became an issue.

So, the evil, wretched, dungheap Bloatfarm tried to do what it does best, shove the problem off on someone else: get others to shoulder the burden.

The Bloatfarm builds inherently risky software and then gets others to reduce the risk (as a public service, mind you) while it captures the profits.

Sounds very cynical does it not?

It is exactly how the dungheap has always operated.