...was lambasted because of it's somewhat dodgy supporting evidence - in particular where you accused Vista of being slow in comparison to XP by quoting a CNET article released in 2007 when SP1 was pre-Beta - I'm going to take this one with a pinch of salt too.
But it's a slow day so what the hell..
"One of the worst qualities of Windows Vista is that it is almost always slower than its predecessor Windows XP when running on the same hardware."
Blatantly untrue. Here's an article where the journalist actually did some research.
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2328909,00.asp
Vista was slower at the time the referenced article was written. Vista was as fast or faster at the time the article you yourself referenced was written.
So saying Blatantly untrue is negating factual findings from the past.
Par Example: It's the same like saying Bill Clinton is the US President. It was true at some stage in the past.
Discussion on:
Message 5 of 1
The best of ZDNet, delivered
ZDNet Newsletters
Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox
