http://zunerama.com/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=58ffff48114b951b131b2080ffc7a9c5&topic=14408.msg113256#msg113256
My favorite bit of FUD from the Roughlydrafted article which immediately brings into question every other article they've ever published was this gem:
but NVIDIA?s own demonstrations of Tegra?s ARM11/integrated graphics show it achieving 35 fps in Quake III. The same software running on Pandora?s Coretex-A8 with SGX GPU core achieves 40-60 fps
Yeah, what they don't tell you is that Tegra was getting 35fps at 800*480 with anti-aliasing while Coretex was getting 40-60fps at 480*320 with no anti-aliasing. FUD FUD FUD! Roughlydrafted has perfected the art of giving you half the relevant information and then letting you draw factually unsupportable conclusions based on incomplete facts. This is why Roughlydrafted articles are always so easy to annihilate.
Discussion on:
Message 15 of 1
The best of ZDNet, delivered
ZDNet Newsletters
Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox
