ie8 fix
madison

Discussion on:

12
Comments

Join the conversation!

0 Votes
+ -
It was just a matter of time.
Erroneous 7th Oct 2009
They didn't bleed enough from Microsoft so now they are going after other big names. No one is safe.
0 Votes
+ -
Two words:
Grayson Peddie 7th Oct 2009
Frivolous lawsuit.
0 Votes
+ -
And they said...
wolf_z 7th Oct 2009
...Eolas would only sue MS. happy

Stupid and blind indeed. The Eolas patent is particularly bad, but all software patents need to be eliminated. Just toss 'em all in the garbage can and revoke *all* of them.

Software is mathematics. Period. You can't patent mathematics. Or algorythms, come to that... happy
Face it, for every Eolas, there are at least four or five big tech companies that get license money from software patents, including Microsoft, IBM, and Adobe. The Business Software Alliance (to whom all the big players belong) bribed the Congress, FTC, and Patent Office to play things their way. Unless it becomes a burden to them, software patents will stay as they are, DMCA will still be around, and copyright law will favor companies who own the rights to long-deceased authors.

Get used to it.
0 Votes
+ -
So now we'll see...
rapson 7th Oct 2009
...if "Eolas the hero" suddenly becomes "Eolas the villain" by doing exactly what it did before.

Carl Rapson
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Eolas sues tech giants over Web technology
Loverock Davidson 7th Oct 2009
And who didn't see this coming? Its funny how everyone wanted them to win against Microsoft and cheered them on, but now I don't hear anyone cheering anymore.
0 Votes
+ -
Actually
Michael Kelly 7th Oct 2009
Other than the regular predictable anti-MS zealots that post on boards such as these, most people DID see the writing on the wall and were hoping for an Eolas defeat.
0 Votes
+ -
Hip, hip hurrah!!! There - now you read it.
No More Microsoft Software Ever! 7th Oct 2009
Just imagine hearing it.
0 Votes
+ -
It was fun when it was only Microsoft
GuidingLight Updated - 7th Oct 2009
that was to be sued, they "deserved it" was the phrase used.

Now it will not be so funny as many will claim that Adobe, Amazon, Apple, Blockbuster, Citigroup, eBay, Frito-Lay, Go Daddy, Google, JC Penney, JPMorgan Chase, Office Depot, Perot Systems, Playboy Enterprises, Staples, Sun, Texas Instruments, Yahoo and YouTube, the second round of defendants, do not deserve it.

And it is also time to remove the idiotic ability to sue everyone in Texas, a state where neither entity is located.
0 Votes
+ -
Oh it's fun to watch them all be sued
Boot_Agnostic 7th Oct 2009
level field of competition, they all are equal in the greed's eye.

So nobody bought up this company and/or its people and shipped it to the melting caps?
0 Votes
+ -
Buy it for how much?
Michael Kelly 7th Oct 2009
Why sell for $100 million when you can sue for over a billion and still have ownership?

You'd have to pay over a billion dollars to convince them to sell. And who wants to spend that kind of money to kill their own reputation? In the end you're better off paying out only a couple hundred million and keeping your reputation intact.
"Distributed hypermedia method for automatically invoking external application providing interaction and display of embedded objects within a hypermedia document," which involved browsers launching a helper application such as Adobe Flash.

Could someone explain to me how Frito-Lay is infringing on this patent?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

ie8 fix