With all due respect, the conclusion date of the contract is determined by the length and the execution date. AT&T had to do some work to prepare for the iPhone, so I consider it unlikely that the deal was signed on the eve of MacWorld 2007. How important was having a carrier lined prior to serious prototyping and development? 18 months important?
Did Engadget report an execution date?
As to renegotiating for the iPad, I can see the possibility. On the other hand, all the iPad needs from AT&T is data, which isn't a scarcity. I imagine they got a first look, but I don't think they were in a position to demand an extension on the iPhone contract. I think Apple could make a convincing case that the iPad related data plans would mean more revenue than a 2 year contract.
Discussion on:
Message 7 of 1
The best of ZDNet, delivered
ZDNet Newsletters
Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox
