I'm sorry, but this is the third Danchev article I've tried to read and he's such a terrible writer that I can't tell what he's talking about half the time. And I'm an experienced software engineer who runs his own Internet site so I'm already well versed in these topics; I can't begin to think of what problems a less knowledgeable person would have reading Danchev's stuff.
The section on the Adobe spoof was clear, but in his next section about some kind of rogue facebook app, he starts talking about "what's particularly interesting" about it and never defines what it is!
His third point about some kind of adult video makes no sense whatsoever. Not only does he not say what it actually is, but the grammar is incorrect and that makes it doubly confusing. Only indirectly by reading his final comments do I get a vague notion that something was compressed in some kind of video.
With Danchev's writing, you have to guess at everything. This is really childish, selfish writing -- writing just to hear yourself talk, not to effectively communicate anything. With the glut of people out of work these days I'm surprised ZDNet can't find better writers.
Discussion on:
Message 4 of 1
The best of ZDNet, delivered
ZDNet Newsletters
Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox
