Reply to Message
When I first read the article, I saw nothing bad in Mr Danchev's syntax, usage, nor idiom. After I read the complaints about the writing, I reread his article and I STILL SEE NOTHING that should evoke such vitriol. His ideas are sequential, logical. The vitriol is uncalled for, and says more about the complainer than Mr Danchev or his writing.
The best of ZDNet, delivered
ZDNet Newsletters
Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox
