The GPL is there to prevent proprietary corporations from integrating the code into their own expensive wares, in effect stealing it. NOT "people might build proprietary extensions to open source programs."
There is no end to excuses compiled by those who don't mind contributing their work to those proprietary corporations to use for piling up vast sums of loot, or those who don't know the difference.
For anyone harping about the intricacies of the GPL, or "FOSS", just try snitching a bit of Microsoft's or Apple's code and using it for your own personal project. Uh-oh, you hit a brick wall. Neither can you pass any of their code on. On the other hand, code covered by the GPL is there for you to snitch and use any way you want and distribute it freely, only it can't be integrated and distributed in proprietary code.
Is that a bad thing? You are FORCED to respect the proprietary "license", why do you find it so difficult to respect the GPL (or FOSS) license?
Somebody gives you a horse and you have to look in his mouth and gripe because you don't like what you see there.
Discussion on:
Message 12 of 1
The best of ZDNet, delivered
ZDNet Newsletters
Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox
