The death of Windows XP: It's your permission to go Chromebook, tablet, Linux, whatever
Summary: Companies will have tough decisions to make when leaving XP behind – and that could provide an opening for Apple, Google and others keen to find a foothold on the enterprise desktop.
It's less than a year until Windows XP support runs out. This is hardly a small, isolated issue — studies suggest that XP accounts for more than 40 per cent enterprise desktops in the UK, for example.
Microsoft is trying to woo customers into upgrading with special offers, but businesses may have a harder decision than ever before when it comes to making up their mind about updating their desktop infrastructure.
That's because the organisations which have been slumbering under their cosy XP duvet for so long will wake up in a very different technology environment to that of 2001, when the now venerable operating system was released.
They'll have to get to grips with a far wider choice of operating systems and hardware, plus a very different Microsoft, and that means for some organisations the decision to swap Windows XP for a later iteration of Windows might not be the automatic move that it would have been even two or three years ago.
And, for Microsoft, the timing on this is all a bit tricky. It's still early days for Windows 8, and its new user interface in particular has unsettled many. So for some companies looking to ditch XP, the need to train end users to use the new UI in Windows 8 may be a concern for them.
Windows 8 has been seen as a transitional operating system, bridging the old and the new (signalling the dawn of Microsoft as a services company). For companies contemplating the leap, even if they jump to Windows 7 (a more likely option for many) they'll know that that big change is coming to Windows.
At the same time, there is a new crop of rival operating systems that are enterprise-credible ready to tempt businesses, including Linux variants and the likes of Android and iOS for those braver souls contemplating embracing a mobile or tablet-only environment.
On the hardware side, many organisations using XP will want to junk their antique kit at the same time as adopting a new OS.
That means that they ought to be open to new form factors as well new operating systems: or even new operating system and new form factors. That could open the door to tablets like Apple's iPad or even Google's Chromebook, even if it is only small trials.
As Ovum principal analyst Roy Illsley puts it, companies have to decide what the desktop should look like. "That might help them because they might decide, 'Only 25 percent of our estate really needs to be desktop PCs, and that 25 percent of desktop PCs we can do the upgrade from XP to Windows 7 within 12 months. The other 75 percent could go mobile or to tablets or straight onto a new platform," he said.
Now, you could argue that many of the organisations still hanging onto XP are by definition late adopters and are thus unlikely to want to risk leading-edge, let alone bleeding-edge, technology. But these organisations are also likely to be holding onto XP in a death grip because they're short of cash.
That means they might be more open to new ways of thinking, and cutting their IT costs, than they otherwise might - that might lead to more hybrid deployments and experimentation.
Most organisations will of course eventually make the upgrade to a newer version of Windows – but the days of the unquestioned monolithic upgrade are long past.
Take the TechRepublic poll: what percentage of your enterprise is running Windows XP?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Permission?
I run a small business
As for Office and email and browsing, I can do that just fine on any platform. MS lost that monopoly a long time ago.
Switch over the Linux
I did switch to Linux
Thanks for your heartfelt concern.
Yeah, right
The article is trolling.
"This article is trolling." huh?
No complaints for what 1-5 users?
Why Stop at 5000
Or to put it in an alternative form, if someone tells me I'd think differently if my situation were completely different, I'd agree, and get back to talking sans hypotheticals.
5000 users??
I wonder how miserable my life will be with 5000 Windows 8 users...
The point is : Users does not care what OS they use; their only concern is there are applications suitable to do their jobs.
Oracle applications ( OPM, ERP which is web-based ), web-based HR app, web-based WMS app
Should I mention Linux-based application for chat, browsing, multimedia, etc??
Users do care
300 Linux users is still a small number. How many are average "I don't know a thing about computer" users? I work at a hospital and everything is windows xp and we are gradually upgrading to 7 and the employees here would not like Linux one bit!
Win 8
And it wasn't a difficult decision at all.
I hate Windows 8...
You know what, i don't really care if MS wants to be in the tablet business, if it helps make them money then that's fine. It's what they are doing to the PC what i don't care for. The desktop UI was not broken, it never was and MS was doing a decent job with it until they released a bi-polar OS, Win 8. The fact is Win 8 is not going to hold. Companies and users would have switched to Win 8 had it be another Win 7 clone with the performance upgrades but since MS thought it was a great idea to change the UI around Xp users won't want to upgrade, they'll take one look at Win 8 and pass on it. Besides needing a new PC to work with Win 7 or 8 (or a diff OS entirely) it's costly. You can change things around on an OS but with having the ability for users that are used to the same UI are going to want to keep that structure. Win 8 would have been so much better if the start screen was an app inside the desktop, having the ability to make it full screen while keeping the desktop structure the same. For those who want the new start screen full screen could have it boot up that way making it the same basic thing as Win 8 already is and keep the classic desktop for those who don't want the new.
MS is trying to force users to work with the new UI rather than allowing them to make a decision on their own. They could have kept Aero Glass as a feature and allow users to turn on/off features based on how much performance they can get out of their PC. Windows 8 could have been a great success if they had stuck primarily on the desktop structure. The bottom line is, if i or anyone else is forced to learn something new, might as well go to Linux or Apple then. There is really no point in continuing to work with MS if they won't listen to consumer feedback and release something that a few eggheads thought was a great idea. They even fired a guy for some negative feedback. You don't have a choice with MS anymore. Now they shove whatever they want down your throat whether you like it or not. Yep change is here and i won't be having it with MS anymore. Time for Linux and Apple.. screw Microsoft.
Win 8 is ugly for power users
MS didn't think the UI through for power users.
What?
I have a lot of problems with Windows 8's multi-monitor features, but hot corners are actually done very well.
I use multiple monitors on my desktop with windows 8 installed.
8 :(
What exactly do you need those for?
So no other company is forcing you to use software a specific way?
Because Apple just makes so much software that is intuitive? Maybe if you've been using a Mac for years. Everyone has the close button on the upper right but on a Mac it's on the upper left. That makes sense.
What I like is that people make assumptions on a product without even trying it. Took me all but 2 seconds to figure out if I hit the windows button, which is on every keyboard, I get a (call it what you want) app | tile | short cut screen. I can click on one of the items or type in the program I want and it appears. Plus I can now group the Short Cuts | apps | Tiles into nice categories so I can find them more quickly.
Master Joe Says...Without the Proper Feedback?
Someone above mentioned that it is difficult to switch applications in Windows 8. Really? Again, the desktop works just liek every version of Windows in the past decade and a half. Where's the issue. Yes, using the Windows 8 style apps takes some getting sued to. I've found them much more comfortable in a touch environment, such as on the Surface Pro. But, Microsoft did the right thing in continuing to support a native Desktop so that A) the legacy applications would work without requiring a major overhaul and B) had they taken the desktop out right away tehre would ahve been mass revolt. The problem is that people complaina about small changes as though they are mountainous. People were perfectly fine learning iOS, which didn't even exist all that long ago. People were perfectly willing to learn Android and even suffer through the various iterations the OS has gone through in its maturing process, and I don't hear massive outcries from the user community. What makes Windows 8 different? Simple. It's a Microsoft product. Anyone who dislikes Microsoft will tell everyone not to use their product because it's terrible. If someone ahs ever claimed that 7 was better than Vista or that it is better than 8, immediately stop listening to anything they ever say about technology again. The desktop and Start menu are almost (if not) identical in vista and 7, and the desktop stays the same in 8. Are you seriously going to tell me that no aero is somehow a tragedy?
Apple hasn't released an iOS version, iTunes for Windows version, or OS X version in YEARS that didn't have major bugs in it (do the research, the evidence is definitely not lacking to support this statement, before those looking to discredit me even embarass themselves by starting their keys a clickin'), yet they are forgiven time and time again. What major bugs are there to be ironed out in blue? I use Windows 8 every single day on my personal PC, as well as on my Surface Pro, which is for personal entertainment purposes but also work purposes. I have no complaints. I don't suddenly feel as though my productivity is spiraling downward because of Windows 8. I haven't developed a major drinking problem, lost the ability to maintain healthy relationships and friendships, become withdrawn from my friends and family, started wearing black make-up and wearing clothes that are too tight for any man to ever wear, and feeling as though my life is a black, meaningless abyss of misery and woe because of Windows 8.
Someone else above claimed that the article is trolling. Well, yes, it kind of is because the "opportunity" to switch to a glorified web browser or a "free" OS that has been around for long enough by now that, if people wanted to use it in mass quantity, they would, and they haven't done it. I hardly doubt Windows 8 is going to change that. If I remember correctly, a similar article was written when Vista came out, and another was written when it was first announced that XP woudl be desupported. If anything, the ridiculous lawsuits brought against Microsoft (primarily in the EU) have caused it to operate from a crippled position. Yet, it STILL absolutely destroys the competition on the desktop, and, for those who haven't bothered to look lately, has a very impressive offering on the server side too (it has since Server 2008 and improved after that).
The point is this. People don't take the time to do their own research. They listen to often misinformed sources or sources with a personal agenda. This isn't limited to technology. Look at where the US is politically today, and you can pretty easily see that this is a fair statement to make as a blanket claim. But, Windows 8 is not the terrible monster that people are trying to make it out to be, and the fact that people are still trying to spin taht shows just how delusional some people are and how even more delusional the people who listen to them are. I'm a Windows 8 user, and I'm perfectly happy and proud to admit it.
--Master Joe
SteelCityPC
One suggestion for you, though. Type your post in a word processor of your choice to catch any spelling errors. Then copy-paste it to the post.