The streets with the slowest broadband in the UK

The streets with the slowest broadband in the UK

Summary: Which streets offer speeds 30 times slower than Britain's average of 17.8Mbps?

SHARE:
TOPICS: Mobility, Networking
4
Screen Shot 2014-04-23 at 09.23.28

Many of us read the recent Ofcom report which delighted in telling us that the UK had the 'best broadband in Europe,' but there's more to it than simple numbers.

The UK telecoms watchdog's report gleefully stated that the UK was well on the way to "the best broadband network in Europe by 2015" -- despite failing to include the fact the UK was only compared to five other countries, rather than all 28 EU member states. Many of those excluded, including Scandinavia and Belgium, enjoy connections that leave the UK in the dust.

Yes, the UK has made progress in potential speeds, price and connections, but in comparison to actual user experiences -- whether it is the frustrating practice of cable connections pinched to set up new subscribers or the often-forgotten areas in the country -- broadband isn't always so hot.

A new survey conducted by uSwitch.com asked broadband users to run 1,896,977 consumer speed tests during the six-month period August 2013 -- January 2014. The company found that Britain's slowest streets for broadband offered average speeds of 0.60Mbps -- 96 times slower than the fastest street and 30 times slower than the UK average speed of 17.8Mbps.

The winners of this accolade were Wheatley Road in Essex and Erw Fawr in Wales. Out of the 50 slowest broadband streets in the country, Essex featured six times, more than any other county. We would be forgiven for thinking that it was only rural areas that suffered from poor speeds, but strangely, residents of one Hampstead street in NW London also appeared on the list.

The ten worst streets in Britain for broadband are below:

Screen Shot 2014-04-23 at 09.21.57
Screen Shot 2014-04-23 at 09.22.08

In comparison, the top ten best streets for broadband are here:

Screen Shot 2014-04-23 at 09.21.35

On average, uSwitch says that 40 percent of Britons experience average speeds of below 5Mbps; while just 15 percent are experiencing superfast speeds of 30Mbps or above. This suggests that while Ofcom figures say superfast broadband is available to 75 percent of the country, only nine percent of the UK are using it.

Marie-Louise Abretti, broadband expert at uSwitch.com, said:

"Broadband is now widely considered the fourth utility, but our speed test data shows that not everyone is getting a decent service. Poor connectivity can severely affect local businesses, impact house prices and children’s education, which is why it’s crucial the government keeps its eye on the ball when it comes to improving UK broadband infrastructure, particularly in remote rural areas."

Topics: Mobility, Networking

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

4 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Poor speed

    Luckily one of my customers has just moved across to a FTTC connection as before their download speed was LESS than 300Kbps if they where lucky, the houses across their carpark (15m) where getting >20Mbs as they where connected to the local exchange not the main exchange over 5 times further away! This was caused by the developers of the business park cutting costs by putting the telecoms ducting down a grass verge beside a footpath to a little lane as that was cheaper than digging up 30m of tarmac that they were paid to! So it's not just down to the likes of BT it's also down to the developers not spending on the infrastructure and cutting corners!
    Tim Messanger
  • Poor speed

    Luckily one of my customers has just moved across to a FTTC connection as before their download speed was LESS than 300Kbps if they where lucky, the houses across their carpark (15m) where getting >20Mbs as they where connected to the local exchange not the main exchange over 5 times further away! This was caused by the developers of the business park cutting costs by putting the telecoms ducting down a grass verge beside a footpath to a little lane as that was cheaper than digging up 30m of tarmac that they were paid to! So it's not just down to the likes of BT it's also down to the developers not spending on the infrastructure and cutting corners!
    Tim Messanger
  • Average Speeds and Actual

    I know of many areas in East Anglia and other rural areas where speeds of 300Kbps would be considered fast. BT have cherry picked projects to get rural Britain to having even a basic broadband service. The result is that we still have a huge difference between 'superfast' in some towns and cities and effectively no internet in rural areas.

    The other issues with this average is that it is very easy to promote high speeds in areas like London (where cable and landline services are available) and these will drag up the average speed. It also depends on price. We can now get much faster broadband in our area (we currently get 8Mbps) but the cost is much higher and not really of value to us. So does this survey measure 'available speed' or what consumers can afford to/ want to pay for?
    trinityict
  • Well that's fast for where I live

    Ferry Lane, Medmenhah near Marlow has NO broadband by wire because we are too far from the Henley-on-Thames and Marlow telephone exchanges. The village is paying over £25,000 to get a proper connection put in place. We cannot get government money for this. There is something for the nearby village of Mill EWnd, but it won't help us. And we are less than 40 miles from London.
    Wockenfuss