The vanishing PC: Race to the bottom accelerates
Summary: The demand for more performance and features has traditionally kept the PC from falling too far, too fast. Those days may now be ending, hastened by cheap tablets. The industry is responding with new platforms for low-cost laptops and tablets running Windows 8 and Android.
Computers and electronics are always getting cheaper. That’s one result of Moore’s Law. But the demand for more performance and features has traditionally kept the PC from falling too far, too fast. Those days may now be ending.
The truth is that things began to change some time ago. The writing has been on the wall since Microsoft released Windows 7, the first version of the operating system with essentially the same system requirements as its predecessor. (Nowadays, system requirements make news only when they are loosened.) But the rapid growth of cheap tablets, fueled by $20 ARM processors and the (sort of) free Android OS, has hastened the decline of traditional PCs. The industry is responding to this with new chips designed for low-cost convertibles and tablets.
Intel’s fourth-generation Core processor, which we now know will be announced at Computex in early June, will almost certainly deliver better performance, especially with graphics. But the focus of Haswell is clearly on better battery life (Intel promises the biggest generational improvement in its history) and improved thermals so that it can squeeze into thin, fan-less Ultrabooks and convertibles. The company says that touch-enabled Haswell Ultrabooks will be available later this year starting at about $600.
That’s a good start, but the real story may be Bay Trail, an overhaul of Intel’s Atom processor due later this year. The platform, which is designed for Windows 8 and Android devices, will be manufactured on a 22nm process, will have a quad-core CPU, and will deliver more than twice the performance of the current Clover Trail tablets. Intel said the Bay Trail platform will be in “touch-enabled thin notebooks with really good performance” starting at around $300 and Android tablets around $200. Most of the least-expensive devices are likely to be convertibles, or what most people consider tablets with detachable keyboards. Last week, an Intel executive told CNET that Windows 8 versions will be a little more expensive — depending on Microsoft’s pricing — but consumers may be willing to pay a bit more to run legacy Windows apps.

Meanwhile, there are rumors that Microsoft is toying with lower prices. Last month, The Wall Street Journal reported that the company has been offering computer makers big breaks on Windows 8 and Office licenses for devices with smaller displays. Also in March, Microsoft lowered the screen resolution requirements for Windows 8, making it a better fit for devices with smaller displays. The upcoming Window 8 refresh, code-named Windows Blue, could reportedly include new editions targeting smaller tablets and convertibles with lower prices.
AMD is used to competing on price, and company executives keep talking about how tablets and good-enough computing play to its strengths with $300-$400 devices. Its current Z-60 processor hasn’t gotten much traction (Vizio uses it in an 11.6-inch tablet), but it has two newer processors, already shipping to computer makers, which should be more competitive. Kabini is a quad-core designed for low-cost ultrathin laptops and Temash, which comes in dual- or quad-core versions, is for Windows 8 convertibles and tablets. At Mobile World Congress, AMD showed some prototype convertibles based on these new chips. These should help to push down prices of all Windows 8 tablets.
These upcoming platforms should make Windows convertibles and tablets more competitive by this holiday season. The PC market isn’t going to disappear overnight, but it is likely to look very different a year from now.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
How will $200 Android PCs sell if $200 tablets dont sell well enough?
Where does this leave the Google Play tablet app ecosystem? It has no uptake. Much like its Chrome OS app ecosystem.
Much like Microsoft, Google will be wise to leave the tanking consumer PC market as is. Because if they do enter it, they will get marketshare but at a loss. Some of the already declining Asian OEMs (Sony, Toshiba, Asus, Acer, LG) will not survive the $200 Android PC market. Imagine getting a $100 Android PC or $200 Chrome OS PC with a lousy ecosystem. Wow!
up 159 percent
"Vanishing" and "race to the bottom"
The vanishing PC: Race to the bottom accelerates
So you agree
But at the end of the day what people are missing is the main point that desktop innovation has stagnated over the years and the focus was on the mobile factor. Why should we buy a PC that offers 15% better performance with 15% less power consumption? Even reinstalling the OS+Applications would be too much of an effort.
But with technologies like hUMA, 3D stacked memory etc we are talking about a new breed of PCs that do make the previous generations obsolete from a technology point of view. In that case there is a point in upgrading because we will notice a real difference.
In my case...
One other thing which nobody has mentioned is the fact that high end PCs have historically been required to play the best computer games. This helped drive the upgrade cycle. Now, the games are developed within the limitations of a console for easy platform porting. This means they barely tax a desktop PC. So, the pressure to upgrade your hardware has been drastically reduced.
Add in the fact that the vast majority of people only used their desktop or laptop for Facebook, Twitter, browsing, and email. For these people, the tablet became the perfect replacement device.
The point is, there are a LOT of factors contributing to the decline in desktop sales. Unless all of those contributing factors change somehow, desktop sales will slowly continue to decline until they match the minimum number required for those of us doing high-end tasks which absolutely require desktop processing power.
I Agree - PCs Aren't Going Away
Sigh...
That is not what anyone has been asserting
People used to replace computers every 3-4 years. Now they're buying gadgets, and letting that PC be run into the ground. My guess is turnover time may switch to 8-10 years.
I think the larger point is that PCs are changing form factors.
PCs are becoming tablets, hybrids and all-in-one devices in addition to laptop/desktop models.
The best thing about first generation tablets was their form factor, touch interface and battery life. Their biggest limitation is the operating system they run. They were designed to run phones and media players and not really designed to be full powered computing devices.
I really tihnk Bay Trail, if it lives up to the promises, will be a huge game changer.
Agreed.
Disagree
Even our older Dell 24" lcd monitors from 2007 put out more heat and use more power than than the 2013 24" monitors we just purchased and the price for 2 of the newer monitors are less than 1 24" was back in 2007.
Here is where you go wrong, let me know what mobile device can currently run dual 24" monitors, open up a full 365 tab, 50,000 lines per tab spreadsheet with thousands of formulas and VLookups without crashing or hanging? I haven't seen a mobile device yet that can do that. Someday maybe... who also wants to view or update that spreadsheet on a mobile device? I sure don't. I used remote desktop on my phone to connect to my desktop because I can, and it well, sucks, I can't really see the screen or icons. I have done it on a tablet as well, works in a pinch but still isn't my preferred method. Give my dual 24" or my 30" monitor anyday over some small tablet for getting real work done or at least a 13" lightweight laptop for doing the real work.
8-10 years?
Shrug
I'd like too
The thing with replacement rate is that new OSes don't need more power to run than before. In the days from Windows 3.1 to Windows Vista, each new version required a step up in hardware to keep running.
But from Windows Vista to Windows 8, each new version required less horsepower than the previous one, so changing hardware is not as much a requirement as it used to be, unless you want some of the newer features like touch screen or USB 3.0, but besides that, a 5-8 years old laptop/desktop is still perfectly adequate for today's requirement (basically anything starting with the Core2 generation).
SSDs are a big plus
I have recently replaced a number of computers I sold people maybe 7 years ago, running XP. They were still in good operating condition, but it was time to move on. And that's with now-trailing-edge hard drives that spin... Ben Myers
Laptop hdds usually burn out quicker then desktop drives.
Still using 6 machines that are 5-9 years old bios dates
8-10 years
Come work for our company
These machines are slowly being replaced -- by 4 year old, off-lease machines that the company is buying by the thousands. So even those who are refreshed are not contributing to the bottom line of companies trying to sell new machines.
40,000 machines at the old refresh rate of 3 years accounts for 120,000 in 9 years. While there are some new machines tricking in, I don't think it accounts for more than 40,000 over that same 9 year period. There are no fewer PCs being used -- there is growth, if anything. But there are 66% fewer new devices being bought. Sales in the current environment are not really indicative of usage.