The Windows XP alternatives gallery
Summary: XP will be falling off the Microsoft support wagon within a year, and Windows 8 is, ah, unattractive. Here are the best of your alternative choices.
Image 2 of 7

(Image: Screenshot by Steven J Vaughan-Nichols/ZDNet)
The Windows 8 Metro eyesore
And, this... thing is the Windows 8 Metro interface. I don't think we're in XP anymore, Toto. Let's see if we can click our ruby slippers — or switch operating systems anyway — and find something more attractive.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
New it
update
Did you read it?
He clearly goes through all the sensible options, mentioning two from apple, two from MS, two from google... And one Linux. His conclusion is MS
Seems you're getting annoyed at what you want him to have said than what he did say.
I assume that you commented without reading
Or maybe you just need to take another of those anti-paranoia pills that you seemingly skipped today.
Really?
Once again, the author knows how to make himself look like an inept Linux fanboy.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder
He doesn't mention anything about windows 8 apart from finding it ugly. He provides a picture. If you find it beautiful then kudos. If you find it ugly, then kudos. Would you prefer a list without his personal opinions? The Linux option is hardly the best looking Linux out there, just one made to look more like home....
Windows 8
to think
Windows 8 has bifurcated users
bifurcated
You're one of the very few people I know that places the Start menu at top
Except it looks more like MacOS X than XP - you're one of the very, very few people I know who places the Start bar on the top, rather than on the bottom.
Although with Linux I suppose that it could be moved - with a bit of effort.
And the arrangement of stuff in the menu will seem pretty alien to anybody who has been using Windows for any length of time. It's not exactly like Windows. It has a learning curve.
Desktop screenshots
Or
I completely agree. To my mind, the tiles thing is just square icons. Everyone's been moving to tile/icon menu's.
Ubuntu got panned for it, as did gnome 3, Mandriva also in Linux. Maybe it's just MS's turn to take it for a bit... People seem to hate change. Over in Linux world the noise surrounding tiled menus has faded now; people are used to this.
Mac OS is a bit different; their stacking menu system was horrendous for getting to your apps; everyone just blitzed the dock, so launchpad has been very popular there.
Now MS have implemented tiled menus and they're getting exactly the same flack I saw ubuntu getting two years ago; it's a menu people, you will get used to it.
"To my mind, the tiles thing is just square icons."
Not only that, but the majority of the icons, despite the hype, are STATIC!
Re: with a bit of effort
You can then go to the windows decoration themes, and chose how you want your windows decorated. You can have them exactly as Windows XYZ (insert your favorite version) places them, or as OS X places them, how CDE/Motif placed them or a number of other variations. You can customize pretty much anything on a modern UNIX window manager. Many come with ready templates "everything as in CDE", "everything as in Windows XP", "Everything as in OS X" etc. The "emulation" is pretty good, down to the bouncing pointer at application launch etc.
It is, after all, just a windows manager. Welcome to the larger world :)
But I agree, SJVN could have made better screenshot.
Not sure whether it was deliberate...
I often wonder the motivation for many of the articles here and elsewhere with subtle snippets of goodness which help the windows 8 take up. Take the great debate *Can this OS be saved?*. Both sides had good points helping win8 adoption, especially the no side!
Just curious!
How many Linux people are running 12 year old versions
RE: "How many Linux people are running 12 year old versions"
Besides, a 12 year old PC, assuming that it still works, probably shipped with Windows 2000 Professional. Most modern Linux distros would run sluggish at best on those old hardware specs, exceptions being mini distros such as Puppy Linux, Slitaz, etc.
How many PCs last for 12 years?
"Besides, a 12 year old PC, assuming that it still works, probably shipped with Windows 2000 Professional. Most modern Linux distros would run sluggish at best on those old hardware specs"
I disagree, Debian with XFCE would only use about 80mb of Ram, Crunchbang is also an option.