Tough filter campaign ahead: Black

Tough filter campaign ahead: Black

Summary: Opponents of the government's proposed internet filtering legislation face tough challenges, according to Peter Black, the recently appointed manager of Electronic Frontiers Australia's (EFA) anti-filter campaign.


Opponents of the government's proposed internet filtering legislation face tough challenges, according to Peter Black, the recently appointed manager of Electronic Frontiers Australia's (EFA) anti-filter campaign.

There's no doubt it'll be quite hard to get the government to change their mind

EFA campaign manager Peter Black

The groups lobbying against the filter need to gain mainstream awareness of the issue and either convince the government to modify its legislation or persuade the Liberal and Greens parties to vote against it in the Senate, he told this week.

"There's no doubt it'll be quite hard to get the government to change their mind," he said. "There's been a lot invested by Senator Conroy and the Rudd Government in this policy. One way is to try and get the legislation blocked in the Senate with the support of the Liberals and Greens. But we're also hoping to lobby the government to make changes to their policy before it goes to Parliament."

One approach EFA is considering is to encourage the government to offer a voluntary filter, either as an opt-in service or provided as standard with the ability for internet users to opt out. "Ideally, we'd like to see no filter at all, but it may be down the line we'll have to have a discussion about an opt-in or opt-out filter," he said.

Labor Senator Kate Lundy yesterday told Crikey she was lobbying within the party for an opt-out filter, describing it as the least-worst option.

While the Greens Party has already announced its opposition to the government's policy, the Liberal Party currently has no official position.

"It's possible the Liberal party will come out against the filter; that was their statement at the last election, and a number of subsequent comments from Liberal MPs," said Black.

"When Tony Abbott became the leader of the Liberal party, he said it's the job of the opposition to oppose. We'd like to see the opposition oppose this policy which they've said before repeatedly is a bad idea."

To succeed, the campaign also needs "a universal message" and to "[get] the word out beyond the technology sector to mainstream, non technology savvy Australians", Black said. EFA wants to "shift the focus away from the 'no clean feed' slogan to a more positive message not only on the flaws in the proposed filter but also provides solutions to the Australian public", he told Crikey.

Black, a senior lecturer at the Queensland University of Technology's School of Law, was appointed EFA's campaign manager last week. He has previously conducted research and written journal articles on media and internet regulation. He is a regular blogger, cricket fanatic and self-described "obsessive-compulsive Twitterer".

There's quite a bit that's been planned for the new year and lots of activity going on behind the scenes

EFA campaign manager Peter Black

"They were looking for someone to manage the various online and offline aspects of the campaign as well as to help with strategic direction," he said.

"It is something I'm very passionate about and there's no shortage of passion around this issue."

Despite this passion, a lack of coordination between groups has reduced the effectiveness of the anti-filter campaign to date, Black said.

"One of the things that I'm hoping to do ... is to become a campaign hub for the activities and facilitate the communication between the organisations," he explained. While Black admits the issue has died down over the Christmas break, "a natural occurrence at that time of the year", he believes the campaign will regain momentum over the coming weeks. "There's quite a bit that's been planned for the new year and lots of activity going on behind the scenes," he said.

"There's the Great Australian Internet Blackout, that'll be in the last week of January. There's been talk around petitions, television commercials and online videos. By the end of the month, we'll see a lot of these things moving out into the public."

Topics: Censorship, Tech Industry

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Allow us to opt out!

    I'd be more than happy to support any net filter, as long as we Adults can opt out of it and that the filter only blocks illegal material, such as child pornography. Refused Classification material is just too broad.

    I am an Adult and I have the right to an open internet!
  • Opt-Out?

    Shouldn't that be "Opt-IN"?

    Opt-out would mean every Internet Connection will be filtered unless there is direct intervention by the user.

    Not every household have children and this should be an option for those who do, but not applied to all, even with an option to opt-out.
  • Filtering

    Does this mean Google will opt out of Australia just like China because of the same type of Government censorship? When did Australia become a dictatorship? I must have missed the memo from Mr Conroy.
  • Google's reasons

    Google changed its position because its infrastructure was attacked and penetrated. It was more than happy to do business in a filtered environment.
  • target Liberal MPs

    Call, write, fax, email your federal Liberals, without their support it won't pass the senate.
  • Petiton?

    Is there an online petition regarding this?
    If this is being pushed by lobby groups such as Christian organisations then they are ignorant of the many issues this raises and makes them compliant to a one world government. Hows that for extrapolation!
  • Who is it that wants a filter?

    The usual suspects tell us to just think of the children, but it seems the push for secret government censorship may be for other reasons, despite Conroy saying if you oppose censorship you must be a pedophile (the filter will do nothing to stop peds).

    The giveaway has been Conroy saying that the filter will be used to block "inappropriate" content, but with no attempt to define that. The idea is starting to smell, with the push seemingly coming from apparatchiks who see an opportunity for political censorship, the godbotherers who think it is their right to tell people what to do, and some other voluble but shadowy supporters.

    Not sure about the last lot, but is it possible that perhaps for example the AFACT gang could have arranged an unseen helping hand for something their corporations might find very useful? That undefined reference to inappropriate remains a concern.
  • Goodbye Conroy and Rudd

    The Government must be kidding themselves if they think that they can classify the entire web. What this means for every Australian is that what is classified will be available. What hasnt been classified won't. That will mean that 3/4 of the Web won't be available to all Australians. What does this mean for ecommerce? What will this mean for acquiring news from overseas? Your guess is as good as mine.
    I for one will do everything in my power to ensure that if this filter is ever deployed in Australia that the Politicians driving the implementation will never be returned to government at the next election. So a Message to Rudd and Conroy if you want back into the job keep your hands off the internet. Play with the web and you'll get burnt by it. If you want to see how powerful social media is in Australia just wait for the next election!!