UK operators won't charge for received calls

UK operators won't charge for received calls

Summary: All the UK's major mobile operators say they are very unlikely to try charging customers for receiving calls as well as making them

TOPICS: Networking

Following suggestions by Europe's telecommunications chief that she would not oppose mobile operators that wanted to charge their customers for receiving calls, all the UK's operators have denied wanting to do any such thing.

European commissioner Viviane Reding said in an interview with the Financial Times on Monday that it was "for operators to decide" whether they wanted to adjust their business models in this way. However, all the major UK operators have told that such a move was unlikely.

A spokesperson for Vodafone said on Tuesday that the "likelihood of any new radical pricing is pretty slim", and confirmed that the operator had "no plans to introduce such a pricing model at the moment".

Reding's comments were in response to a question that was related to the European Commission's proposals for slashing the "termination rates" that operators charge each other to interconnect calls. On Tuesday, however, the operator 3 said in a statement that "there is no reason for the EC recommendation to result in receiver pays".

An spokesperson said Orange "can confirm that it has no intention to introduce charges for [its] customers to receive calls domestically". T-Mobile's spokesperson said: "We don't plan to charge customers to receive calls in the UK."

O2's spokesperson told that "any move to such a system [receiving party pays, or RRP] would need to take place across the EU at once, in order not to distort the market", adding: "It is not clear that RPP actually conveys any overall benefit to consumers — in countries with RPP we tend to see much lower penetration than in the EU."

A spokesperson for Reding's office told that the very suggestion of RPP in Europe was a "lobbying statement" designed to make the Commission's recommendations for lower termination rates seem unattractive. "We believe that the threat by some to introduce 'receiving party pays' is an empty threat, as a company that would introduce this in Europe would kick themselves out of the market," the spokesperson said.

Topic: Networking

David Meyer

About David Meyer

David Meyer is a freelance technology journalist. He fell into journalism when he realised his musical career wouldn't pay the bills. David's main focus is on communications, as well as internet technologies, regulation and mobile devices.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Telemarketing calls charged

    If they did charge to receive calls, that would start a wave of telemarketing hatred. Not only will you receive calls you don't want, you'll pay for it too.
    Christian Brown
  • telemarketing! indeed

    heh telemarketing is already pretty high on the hate scale. they always call when you are busy doing something productive. no i don't want to sign up for BT for a 50 year contract! with 1p off my calls... etc..
  • And don't forget...

    The random wrong numbers. And, then there's the annoying habit of some bosses to call you when you're off the clock. Yes, it'd be a truly venal act if mobile companies charged you for answering your electric ball and chain. Maybe if the world forgot about these foul instruments of torture then the global warming problem might be solved or something.

    And I am reminded that (time for a vent) there's the deliberately annoying calls by teenage tossers who think that nothing can touch them because they're not adults yet and that the law will let them off with a warning, or a "family conference" or some other inane bs. Sorry about the last bit, but that has happened in our street, although that stopped soon after his Mum tossed his scooter in the river when she found out! The local constabulary were hugely amused, or so it appeared. I guess they knew of the miscreant.