4G hands-on: Testing the iPhone 5 and Samsung Galaxy S3 on EE's network
Summary: EE is poised to unleash 4G LTE services on the UK. ZDNet got hands-on with the network to find out just how fast the first UK-wide 4G network really is.
Image 5 of 5

Salem also said the company had been upgrading its 2G and 3G technology at the same time as upgrading cell sites to be able to handle 4G technology. Included in the upgrades was fibre-based gigabit ethernet backhaul.
"An important part of the rollout phase of 4G is that there is a really strong 3G network behind it as well," Salem said. "In order to have credible 4G, you need to have credible 3G as your fallback. You can't have such a huge speed drop as you go beyond the edge of coverage. It takes years to do that."
The image above shows a 4G-enabled iPhone 5 speed test history that illustrates the problems of variability and use-load. The same speed tests run within just minutes of each other returned results between just over 5.5Mbps and just under 40Mbps.
Image: Ben Woods
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Download speeds
What would make one phone download so much faster than the other on 4G?
If I'm thinking in PC terms, the speed bottleneck is usually the internet provider and not the PC hardware or modem. Is it the case that mobile phone hardware is not ready for these speeds yet?
Reliable data rates
Data rates will depend on the mobile phone as the chipset used will be different (a bit like different performance on WiFi connections).
But what it also highlights is that in a controlled environment (as Mytheroo points out next to the transceiver with negligible traffic loading) there is still massive swings in performance on the same device. For the iPhone it goes from 5 to 40Mbps. That is a massive swing in speed - although 5Mbps is still in my opinion an acceptable speed.
This should become part of a standard review just like battery life is now?
3G
3g vs 4g LTE
Standing next to the transceiver is a pretty irrelevant test for me :-)