Google's UK tax bill: £6m for a year when it made £395m
Summary: The tech giant, already under fire for its tax management practices, is set to pay £6m UK tax in a year when its turnover was £395m - a rate of 1.5 percent
This story has been updated to correct an inaccuracy in the figures initially confirmed by Google.
Google's UK subsidiary will pay £6m in tax for 2011, a year when its revenue was £395m. It's a tally likely to revive criticism over how much the tech giant contributes to the UK's coffers.
The tax bill, revealed in a filing by Google UK to Companies House on Tuesday, works out at around 1.5 percent of its revenue.

However, the 2011 payment is a jump in corporation tax for the company: in the six years to 2010, it handed over only £8m in total, according to figures reported by The Telegraph and confirmed by Google. Last year, the bill came to £935,000, against £2.39bn of revenue.
"We comply with all the tax rules in the UK," a Google spokesperson told ZDNet. "We make a big contribution to the UK economy by employing over a thousand people, helping hundreds of thousands of businesses to grow online and investing millions supporting new tech businesses in East London."
Google has come under fire in the past over the amount of tax it pays in Britain. While the UK is one of its largest markets, its European headquarters are located in Ireland, where corporate taxes are low. In addition, Google Europe pays a licensing fee of billions of Euros to its Bermuda subsidiary, which has the effect of lessening its tax burden in the region.
Google's chairman Eric Schmidt himself acknowledged a year ago that the company could make a bigger contribution in the UK.
"We could pay more, but it would be very hard to say to our shareholders 'we feel very sorry for these British people, so we're going to pay millions of dollars in extra taxes that we're not required to do'. There are probably laws against that," Schmidt said at the Edinburgh International Television Festival 2011, according to the Guardian.
In its filing on Tuesday, Google UK reported a loss after tax of £24.1m, after counting an employee share allocation cost of £51.45m. Without that, the subsidiary had a profit of £27m.
In May, it emerged that Google had made a loss in Australia and so paid $74,176 in corporate tax for 2011, down from $1.1m the previous year. Its New Zealand arm also lost money and ended up contributing only $109,000 in tax.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Contempt
They never disappoint my expectations :-(
Astonishly I find most ZDNET bloggers treat the same companies with a degree of respect.
I treat both the aforementioned with contempt.
But I want it!
Here's what the politicians do: first they tell people that "rich corporations aren't paying their fair share." Then, because they are not stupid and they do not want every business in the land moving to Ireland, they don't actually raise taxes on the corporations. The press, being in the pocket of politicians, covers the speeches about "fair share," but never tells you what happened afterwards. This way, people think the politicians are out there Doing Good, but the politicians don't have to drive employers out of the country en masse, like France is about to do.
Guess what? Come next election, the politicians will once again be squawking about "rich corporations not paying their fair share." Do us all a favor: stop falling for it.
Did Google break any tax laws?
Bravo Google
The free market has driven Google's response but the bloated state and its greedy dependants just don't get it.
Did Google do anything illegal?
My sentiment as well...
Of course, I'm sure that such people don't have RRSPs, Tax-Free Savings Accounts, and don't write off interest on their mortgage, where applicable.
Honestly, look in your own backyard - this is one of the rare occasions where people can actually *DO* something about this. Unfortunately, the first step is making the decision to elect a government that is going to close these loopholes and force corporations to pay the taxes at an "ethical" rate (whatever that might mean, I guess). The second step is reaping what you sow. If it means corporations are going to pack up and go elsewhere due to stricter tax laws, well so be it. They're "unethical" anyway, so good riddance!
Google evaded more tax than that
If the deduction is legal, they
what a lie
- What a lie !!!, google has killed so many small business, because of the 'free' 'open' source model to line its pockets with cash...
Hallow claim
lies, damn lies and accounting....
Its easy to justify it to the shareholders, just quote your mission statement: "don't be evil".
Paying yourself a $1bn 'licence fee' just to make the accounts look like you made no profits isn't exactly angelic. And it isn't just the UK this applies to, how little did they pay in the US?
Accounting...
True, but that $1bn in licensing fees also has to be accounted for as revenue in the Bermuda (or wherever) subsidiary, and that revenue is taxed. In this case, the good ol' Bermuda government gets to enjoy a cool $50 Million in tax dollars for being a nice friendly tax haven for foreign corporations. Not that it does the US or UK any good.
Go Google
Did something chang while I wasn't looking?