Looking deeper into Comcast's new cap

September 2, 2008, 10:52am PDT | Length: 00:01:25
ZDNet Senior Editor Sam Diaz offers his take on Comcast's recent announcement that it will begin implementing a Web-surfing limit on its customers October 1. Imposing data limits could discourage existing users from experimenting with alternatives to cable TV, Diaz says.
Is Steve Jobs slowly passing the baton?

Is Steve Jobs slowly passing the baton?

ZDNet's Sam Diaz offers his views on Steve Jobs' presentation at the Apple notebook event...

RealDVD goes live, let the lawsuits begin

RealDVD goes live, let the lawsuits begin

ZDNet senior editor Sam Diaz offers his views on the recent lawsuits filed by the movie industry...

Microsoft's rough start to a new beginning

Microsoft's rough start to a new beginning

ZDNet senior editor Sam Diaz shares his views on Microsoft's recent commercial starring Bill...

TiVo's new strategy: Too little, too late?

TiVo's new strategy: Too little, too late?

ZDNet Senior Editor Sam Diaz says it's time for TiVo to focus its resources on licensing its...

Dark clouds may hurt growth efforts

Dark clouds may hurt growth efforts

ZDNet Senior Editor Sam Diaz isn't ready to give up on cloud computing just yet, even after...

Dell changes gears for a comeback

Dell changes gears for a comeback

ZDNet Senior Editor Sam Diaz says Dell's recent product announcements show the company is...

Will Wi-Fi fly with travelers?

Will Wi-Fi fly with travelers?

ZDNet Senior Editor Sam Diaz gives his take on Delta Air Lines' announcement that it will be...

Cuil is not cool

Cuil is not cool

ZDNet's senior editor Sam Diaz shares his views on the new search engine Cuil. He says the...

Talkback Most Recent of 2 Talkback(s)

  • What's behind the Comcast cap?
    Well, I say we should strike "Comcast" and substitute "Cable" in its place!

    What I dislike the most about politically correct constructs is the milky-toast tone typically used.

    Cable Internet IS DEAD! The dinky little coax does well delivering low grade T.V., and requires relatively little bandwidth. But Internet access is very desirable and competes directly with T.V. delivery and can only be managed by limiting Internet bandwidth in order to protect their bread & butter product.(The real money maker)

    Cable was caught with their skirts/pants down and found themselves very cornered with no outs! Their only hope is a multi-billion dollar capital injection to re-cable their entire infrastructure to a "fiber optic" delivery service. How competitive would that be? Satellite service starts at $19.00!

    Our national Internet structure is currently Wire, cable, wireless and satellite. Cable was originally designed to compete with off-air local broadcasts. In it's day, it was great.

    The future for "copper pair" multimedia content AND broadband Internet availability has never been brighter! New developments in technology boosting ever increasing bandwidth just keeps coming and coming. 100Mb/s is now available and 500+ is right on the horizon. Wireless, if done right, offers an unimaginable universe of space. Satellite Internet is relatively stagnant. (Too expensive).

    Cable Internet is DEAD! High definition TV and movie delivery is where the money is!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    RS9
    3rd Sep 2008
  • Why is this a video?
    Why is this a video?

    If you were just going to read it to me anyway, why use the bandwidth?

    Your point is valid, but text would have been fine.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    caspianhiro
    3rd Sep 2008

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources

Facebook Activity