PARC's plan to stop the Internet from crashing

March 9, 2011, 12:00am PST | Length: 00:05:39
"Content distribution has reached a scale that simply doesn't work," says Van Jacobson. The scientist and research fellow at Xerox’s Palo Alto Research Center talks to ZDNet's Sumi Das about Content-Centric Networking (CCN) a new technology he's developed that could make content distribution on the Net more efficient.

Transcript

PARC's plan to stop the Internet from crashing

Background sounds

>> As more and more bandwidth heavy applications and websites crowd the Internet, web congestion becomes an increasingly difficult challenge, but scientists at Silicon Valley's inaudible Research Lab, PARC, are working on the problem developing new technologies to re-architect how the Internet runs. With me is Van Jacobson, a Research Fellow at PARC. Van, thanks for joining me today.

>> Van Jacobson: Thank you for having me.

>> Before we get into the issue of web congestion, we wanted to talk a little bit about you. You're a scientist and one of the key contributors to developing the original protocols in laying the foundation for the Internet backbone so tell us a little bit about your background. It sounds like there's a lot that you've done in the past.

>> Van Jacobson: I was working at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab making control systems for big particle accelerators that took me into computer networking in the early 70s and it was more interesting than accelerators so I kept working on it and for about 25 years I ran the Network Research Group at LBL then I left there and spent a few years at CISCO as inaudible scientist. Left Cisco to do a startup called Packet Design with Judy Estrin and then in 2006 went to PARC and started working on Content Centric Networking.

>> So that's the technological breakthrough, content centric, do I have that right?

>> Van Jacobson: Yes.

>> Content Centric Networking. CCN as you sometimes call it and this is going to help keep the Internet from getting overloaded. Explain how it works.

>> Van Jacobson: If you look at how people use the Internet, they're asking for some piece of content they want; a video they want to watch, song that they want to download from iTunes, Tweets that are coming out, but the Internet was originally designed before we had this notion of data that people would want and it was designed for computers to make phone calls to other computers and that's a really inefficient way of distributing content. You think of having to get your TV programs by making a phone call to the TV station that kind of works out where you're making the phone call but at the TV station they can be getting hundreds of thousands of calls all asking for the same stuff and the goal of Content Centric Networking is to get out of this phone call world and instead ask the network for what you want; not say who you want to talk to but say what content you want and that lets it be far more efficient at doing distribution.

>> So what's the danger of proceeding with sort of the status quo that we have?

>> Van Jacobson: The problem is that content distribution has reached the scale where what we have simply doesn't work and an easy example of that is if you remember the Susan Boyle phenomenon of a couple of years ago over a period of four days a 140 million copies of that video were played by YouTube to people watching it all over the world and if you multiple the bandwidth of that video about a megabit times 140 million viewers, there's no technology, not communication's technology on the planet that can deal with that kind of load. YouTube can handle it because they fool the Internet. They're not really a place that you make a phone call to. They're actually a big distributed content source. They're spread out all over the planet so they don't get the kind of traffic concentration that would present something from working, but basically Google is the only place that can do thought.

>> And if you're not Google tough luck?

>> Van Jacobson: Exactly. I think that's probably not a world we want to end up with. There's a lot of good ideas that people have for content inaudible and things like Twitter and Facebook that are easy to think about, are easy to rule out at a small scale but making them Internet scale is really hard because you have to invest all of your effort in fooling the Internet and we'd like to make a Net that works the way that people think it works; that you ask for what you want and you ask the Net directly for what you want and it can give it to you.

>> You shouldn't have to be a billion dollar company to be able to distribute information on the Net in other words.

>> Van Jacobson: Exactly.

>> So what will it take to make CCN a reality? You're going to be facing some challenges I would imagine.

>> Van Jacobson: We spent the last five years at PARC doing an open source prototype of the protocols. They're available at a site called CCNX.orgs. Anybody can download and play with them and the biggest challenge is rolling it out and getting people to try it in different environments, show that it works, get the rough edges off but we're using it to solve problems now with big companies like Samsung trying to make the mobile environment work better.

>> Well, I think all the consumers of web information and video fanatics are pulling for you so thank you so much for explaining this to us.

>> Van Jacobson: Thank you for having me.

>> Thanks for watching.

Background sounds

==== Transcribed by Automatic Sync Technologies ====

A look back with former Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz

A look back with former Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz

In June of 2010, CNET sat down with Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz to get her thoughts on everything from...

VC: How the 'hypernet' is changing the Internet

VC: How the 'hypernet' is changing the Internet

At the Always On Silicon Valley Innovation Summit, Elevation Partners' Roger McNamee argues that...

ZDNet users: Congratulations on 20 years

ZDNet users: Congratulations on 20 years

Through Skype video conferencing, ZDNet readers from around the world congratulate ZDNet on 20...

The month ahead: Can Windows 7 close the Vista flop chapter?

The month ahead: Can Windows 7 close the Vista flop chapter?

ZDNet correspondent Sumi Das and senior editor Sam Diaz share the early word on the highly...

Is the Apple rumor mill getting out of control?

Is the Apple rumor mill getting out of control?

ZDNet Senior Editor Sam Diaz shares his thoughts on the constant rumors surrounding Apple’s...

Is AT&T slowly dethroning the almighty iPhone?

Is AT&T slowly dethroning the almighty iPhone?

ZDNet Senior Editor Sam Diaz shares his views on the release of Apple's new iPhone 3G S. Diaz...

The month ahead: Social networks to shake things up in May

The month ahead: Social networks to shake things up in May

ZDNet correspondent Sumi Das speaks with senior editor Sam Diaz about the efforts of Twitter,...

Microsoft: Internet both safer and more dangerous

Microsoft: Internet both safer and more dangerous

In an interview, Microsoft security executive Scott Charney tells CNET News' Ina Fried about the...

8
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: PARC's plan to stop the Internet from crashing
jasonhawk 18th Aug
That's because of poor technique by the presenting website's engineering staff. Influenced, no doubt, by marketing. As usual. Buy Essay | Course Work | Buy Assignment | Buy Thesis | Buy Dissertation
This site is a good example of how bad design compounds the server bandwidth problem. As the video ends, it automatically switches to another video, with no obvious way to return to the original video. Reloading the page brings back the original video, but then the cached copy has been lost, seeking does not work, and the entire video must be reloaded from the server in order to review information toward the end of the video (ccnx.org is what I was looking for). Google has done a much better job with their YouTube service (their videos can begin downloading at any point so seeking works instantly, and their cache is much more persistent) thus their bandwidth usage per video has to be much lower than that of zdnet.
0 Votes
+ -
So what is it???
All I see is a short paragraph saying it exists!
0 Votes
+ -
@nofixed@...
It appears you are not a very good listener. Try watching it again, he clearly explains the concepts without giving away the store.
0 Votes
+ -
@nofixed@...
Exactly! I had no idea where the "content" was. I had to click on the transcript link to read the interview/discussion. Poor design on ZDNet! Then the link/transcript has an "s" on the end of ".org". Kinda' sloppy if you ask me. Yes - I run No-Script, (very wary of java etc..) but even after disabling it I still couldn't access the content. Just a bunch of ads.
If the current model of content distribution "simply doesn't work", then how is it this content was made available? Poorly, no doubt, but as the above commenters have noted, that's because of poor technique by the presenting website's engineering staff. Influenced, no doubt, by marketing. As usual.
0 Votes
+ -
this is a non story
wolfmeiister@... 22nd Apr 2011
CCN??? Ever heard of CDN?

This is old news

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_delivery_network
0 Votes
+ -
Video does not run for me. How bad can your service be?????????
That's because of poor technique by the presenting website's engineering staff. Influenced, no doubt, by marketing. As usual. Buy Essay | Course Work | Buy Assignment | Buy Thesis | Buy Dissertation

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources

Facebook Activity