Voice control showdown: Siri vs Google Now, S Voice, BlackBerry and Windows Phone 8
Summary: Smartphone makers are looking to voice control and personal assistants to make their hardware stand-out. But are all voice control systems created equally?
Image 4 of 7
S Voice is Samsung's voice control system found on handsets, like the Galaxy S3 or in this case its Galaxy Note II 'phablet'.
Like the other systems in the test here, S Voice is well skilled in performing tasks like switching Bluetooth on or off on the phone, or sending a text message to a contact. Weirdly though, the S Voice system can't seem to send an email. You can also use it to update third party apps like Twitter or Facebook, though.
On the occasions that S Voice doesn't quite hear the instructions clearly (or correctly) it will search for the nearest match to what it heard. The system also does better than some of the others in the test with things like scheduling. For example, if you try and schedule an appointment for the same time as another that is already in your calendar, it will warn you and pop the other meeting info to check you want to schedule two things for the same time. The BlackBerry voice system doesn't do this, but Siri does.
S Voice was also one of the only other systems (in addition to Siri) to correctly put a reminder in the calendar when asked to "buy flowers on Valentine's day". It also did pretty well on the Nandos test – asking where the closest was automatically resulted in a web search, though there was no mapping result to be found.
However, asking S Voice "how to get to London Bridge" resulted in Google Navigation popping open an address box that required pressing a button to select the precise destination.
For me the voice recognition seems to be a bit hit-and-miss with S Voice: on some occasions I was impressed that it could pick up what I wanted it to do, but in others, it repeatedly got things wrong, such as when using the calculator. It also doesn't seem to understand computational function, as when it did finally recognise me telling it to add 460 to 320 it responed: "I don't know if I can answer that properly, do you want me to search the internet for 460 + 320?".
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Assumptions...
Fine
You mean those adds that make
Siri and iPhone/iPad are just toys for ....
If an iPhone can simultaneously control 32 different external devices running each a different application with 1 ms precision, and still allow me to use the device as a smartphone, then we are cool. Android can't do that off the shelf, but I have modified it to so for my personal use. Can't do that with an iPhone.
Until I will only consider it as a toy for shallow people that don't know any better.
I've heard of it because of ZDnet!
Seen or heard of it - nope.
Your or An
I have an iphone 4
Then apple bought the company called Siri and suddenly the app was gone.
Then apple needed a bullet point feature spec list sheet item to sell the 4s because it wasn't actually better than the iphone 4 in any way.
So siri came back as an iphone 4s exclusive because apple told me that the iphone 4 wasn't powerful enough to run siri. Refer to the first sentence in my post to see apple's lie.
Apple Lie
then why did they pull it? (nt)
Worked better
correctly put.
I think such comparisons shall bring in pertinent points like what all categories an app is capable to attend of... like... due to ongoing dispute with the level of integration of voice assistants, some functionality differences are inherent among apps... that should be highlighted first... before comparison... In fact, compare them on differences, then come about what similar they can do.... and who well in compared to each other...
I may appear a little vague over here.... but a person with deep understanding about the task at hand ... will understand ... so is the work and duty of a blogger/reporter... to present it in an objective way so that it generates genuine interest rather than getting a feeling that we wasted time to listen to a fan boy...
What... are you... talking... about...
He's.... using....
Windows Phone
You should post your test
Here is what I like, and don't like, about WP8 voice
With WP8, when a text comes in, my phone asks me if I want it read to me. I don't have to press anything, never have to take my eyes off the road or my hands off the wheel. After the text has been read, WP8 asks me if I want to respond. Again, no button pressing. If I answer yes, I can dictate a message and send it. The entire conversation is very natural and at no point do I look at the screen or press a button or tap a screen of any kind.
If the other platforms do that as well, kudos. My iphone 4 certainly could not do that.
What I don't like: dictation is lacking some much needed control. While it handles English extremely well, there is no way of correcting a single word or spelling out a proper noun. So everything up to and after dictation is fantastic on WP8. Dictation can be extremely frustrating if any mistakes are made. Your only 2 choices are to try again or just hope that the person on the other end can sound it out and figure it out.
Also, failed to play to its strengths
I don't believe any of the other OSes can do those things.
So, WP is (as usual) unique in it's approach. In some ways, much much better, and in other ways severely lacking...like the OS itself.
And I cannot compare to Android, but I will contest that WP's voice recognition is much more accurate than Siri. I would bet Android's is better still, since Google have been doing this stuff for a long time.
Yes, this could be a strong feature
So I've played around with it to control music but not often. What would be great is if I could use voice to control a navigation app without once having to look at or tap the screen. I haven't found a fully voice controlled navigation app though. Do you know of one?
Re: Strong Feature...