WA to abandon shared services

WA to abandon shared services

Summary: Western Australian Premier Colin Barnett has today said that the government will drop its pursuit of shared IT services after yet another report stated the project is overdue, over budget and unlikely ever to deliver on promised savings.

SHARE:

Western Australian Premier Colin Barnett has today said that the government will drop its pursuit of shared IT services after yet another report stated the project is overdue, over budget and unlikely ever to deliver on promised savings.

The original strategy aired in 2003 had planned to supply 90 Western Australian government agencies with shared services via shared services centres including the Department of Treasury and Finance Shared Services Centre, the Health Corporate Network and the Education Training Shared Services Centre.

A cost-benefit analysis into the troubled and long-overdue shared services project by the Economic Regulation Authority (ERA) tabled in WA parliament today revealed that the 2003 business case for shared services plan was too ambitious in its original costings.

"The proposed benefits were overly optimistic, the true cost of the project was underestimated and the proposed roll-in schedule was not realistic. This, together with decisions made regarding customisation of the IT system during the initial stages of the project, has caused problems that are still influencing the service delivery of the [Department of Treasury and Finance Shared Services Centre] today," the ERA's report said.

The ERA report provided a damning insight into the ongoing and unforeseen costs agencies are experiencing after moving onto shared services. Particularly those provided by the Department of Treasury and Finance Shared Services Centre (DTFSSC), including the cost of running parallel work processes to ensure correct data was being received from the department and an unwillingness from agencies to trust the DTFSSC.

Key implementation partner Oracle also received a beating from the ERA report, which said that rolled-in agencies had been experiencing considerable technical issues using the Oracle system, including the need for extensive customisation to make the software even usable.

"If DTFSSC was to continue in some form, the authority is of the view that the Oracle eBusiness system would need to be upgraded to the latest version. It is believed that this latest version is more shared services-centric and may eliminate the need for excessive customisation of the system in the future," the report said, adding that the projected cost of upgrading the system would see an extra $35 million thrown at the project.

The ERA gave the government a financial ultimatum when considering the future of the project: either stop agency roll-ins to fix the project issues and spend more to upgrade the Oracle software or can the shared services project. The ERA report acted as the straw that broke the government's back, however, with Barnett today recommending that government agencies go back to procuring their own separate IT services.

"The ERA's analysis indicates that decommissioning the OSS represents the least cost and most certain option for delivering corporate services," the premier said today.

However, the decommissioning process won't be painless, the premier said, appointing Finance Minister Simon O'Brien and director-general of finance Anne Nolan to head up the dismantling committee to be made up of agency directors-general, CEOs and an independent operative.

"There remains considerable work to progressively decommission the OSS, including how to best leverage off existing systems and continuing procurement services. The impact on the budget will also need to be fully considered," the premier said.

When outed in 2003, the project has been due for completion within three years, coming in at a cost of $91 million to the state government, offset by $50 million a year in savings from the government's back office purse.

By 2008, the government had thrown a massive $435 million at the project with nothing to show for it. The then-treasurer Troy Buswell said that the project had a long and sorry history and projected that it wouldn't be completed until 2013.

The ERA's negative assessment on the shared services project joins the chorus of dissenters including the WA's auditor-general last year, who said that the project was unlikely to deliver projected cost savings.

Western Australia joins the ranks of the governments which have tried and failed to implement a shared services nirvana, the ERA report added.

Queensland, for example, last year canned its exclusive shared services strategy following the Queensland Health payroll debacle, which saw nurses missing their pay cheques and deceased members of staff automatically rostered to work.

Topics: Government, Government AU, Oracle

Luke Hopewell

About Luke Hopewell

A fresh recruit onto the tech journalism battlefield, Luke Hopewell is eager to see some action. After a tour of duty in the belly of the Telstra beast, he is keen to report big stories on the enterprise beat. Drawing on past experience in radio, print and magazine, he plans to ask all the tough questions you want answered.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

4 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • None would have detected the impending doom of OSS but for the chorus of two brave public servants. Not the AG - instead AW and RA. If not for them this debacle would have continued unchecked. The Auditor General could not apparently detect what the ERA could detect.
    Casual Observer
  • Casual Observer - not true, many of us fought behind the scenes and brought details to the attention of powerful government and bueaucratic persons (though not in anyway detracting from the good work of mr alexander). I'm waiting for the link to be drawn to the under treasurer's assurances of the success of the project and the fact that he staked his job on it... is he now going to resign as indicated or did the transfer of this mismanaged portfolio (along with several others) to the newly created Department of Finance, save his skin? Doubt he'll be held accountable. Just look at the cost blow outs for all the DTF projects (Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth Arena, etc etc) the fat cats are never accountable, they just keep leaving a trail of desctruction behind them... Marney (the under treasurer of treasury and former dtf) was inflexible and downright vicious (in the now famous words of WA's seniors minister) in ensuring agencies were caught up in this costly debacle... where's the 3% marney? where's the 3% now? totally lost and insignificant in the sea of cost: a $444m loss + $2b rebuild....
    Nuff-6e3c8
  • PS. the auditor general was a former colleague and associate of the treasury executive... was actually slated to be the new under treasurer when marney was appointed... strange how his report was favourable...
    Nuff-6e3c8
  • This should be a timely hint to the Premier of NSW Mr O/Barrell to reassess his one size fits all approach to ICT. The simple fact is that if you create an institutional monoploy on any process then there is no simple comparison to assess the costs with. Most Government entities have their own specific ICT requirements that cannot be tailor made to fit all users across the broad spectrum and indeed within these entities individual user requirements cannot be made to the same model also. When individual requirements are instituted they are normally low cost and in many cases designed and implemented by the users themselves.
    BoomerMMW