What is Aereo and why does it have the TV networks in an uproar?
Summary: Aereo is the new internet service company that has CBS and Fox threatening to shut down their broadcast stations and move their TV networks to cable. But what is Aereo exactly — and why does it have TV networks in such a state?
When Chet Kanojia came up with the idea of Aereo, I'm sure he never dreamed that broadcast TV networks, such as Fox, would threaten to shutter their local stations and move their content exclusively to cable to avoid it being shared over the internet.

Aereo, itself, is based on a very simple idea. Many people want to cut the cable cord, but find it hard to watch the major broadcast networks even with an over-the-air (OTA) antenna. Aereo takes several existing technologies and creates a packaged solution for these people.
First, Aereo sets up clusters of miniature antennas in an area. When you sign up for the service, you are assigned two of those antennas. One is for watching live shows and the other is for recording programs. Your local OTA shows are then streamed to a cloud-based digital video recorder (DVR)-like service.
This isn't just a TiVo in the clouds, though. Whether you're watching a "live" show or a recorded one, you're creating, the company states, "three separate unique copies of the show, each in a different bit rate optimized for different streaming conditions. The lowest bit rate file is ideal for streaming over 3G connections. The medium rate file will work well over most wi-fi connections. The highest rate file is intended for really fast broadband connections. While watching, you can choose the Video Quality on your device. If you select 'auto', you will automatically choose the best bit rate for your current network conditions".
The only customer problem with this is that, at most, you can only record up to 40 hours of video. If you're like me, that's nowhere near enough storage.
When you want to watch your local TV, you then stream your shows to a wide variety of devices. Currently, you can watch Aereo shows on PCs with up-to-date versions of Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Opera, or Internet Explorer web browsers. You can also watch shows on Apple iPads; iPhones running iOS 4.x or better; Apple TV, using Airplay; and Roku units with 3.0 or higher firmware. Android support will be arriving shortly.
At this time, the service is only available in New York City. You can't, for example, subscribe to the service in Chicago and watch New York City channels. Aereo is planning on expanding to 22 new cities in 2013.
Sounds simple enough, doesn't it? It's really not much different from what I currently do with my OTA antenna and my TiVo Premiere.
Many broadcast companies see this, however, as threatening their business models. While advertising was once the life's blood for broadcast TV, over the last few years, cable and satellite operator retransmission fees has become vital to their business. Aereo doesn't pay such a surcharge. As a result, several of these companies, including CBS, ZDNet's parent company, have taken Aereo to court on copyright grounds.
In the courtroom, the networks have lost twice. Given that the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that they have "not demonstrated that they are likely to prevail on the merits of this claim in their copyright infringement action", it seems unlikely they'll win in the courts.
So it is that CBS and Fox are threatening to turn off OTA broadcasts in NYC if Aereo continues to stream broadcast TV without paying retransmission fees. As an alternative to switching to black, CBS and Fox are proposing that their OTA signals would only be available to OTA subscribers using some as-yet-unknown digital rights management (DRM) package.
Let's hope that all sides can come to a mutual agreement and that it doesn't come to that.
Related Stories:
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Subject line? uh well to comment on the article would be the subject.
How does one watch more than 40 hours per week (and not constantly fall behind once trying to watch what you already have recorded)? Sounds moronic.
Anything that gets TV networks mad MUST be good for the consumer.
Better advice, stop watching mind numbing TV programs and Sport all together. O'right then why would you even need bother to exist?
Sometimes people like to keep recordings indefinitely
Not true
My 2 cents on 40 hours per week
Get 'em mad
Better advice, stop watching mind numbing TV programs and Sport all together
That's what I did years ago. No movies and no new music. I read books, and buy (mostly) fifty cent used CD's; I have a changer that can hold 330 of them.
It might make the TV networks mad. Don't know as it's good for consmers, though.
RIAA does not like me.
I buy my music on CD.
I buy them used and next to free;
RIAA does NOT like me.
My dialup line is far too slow
To download music don't 'you know?
My radio is on the air,
For online music, I don't care.
And in my player, decades old,
I've folk songs, klezmer, Russians bold....
With obscure labels yet untold,
My carousel is quite enrolled.
RUM tiddle iddle iddle RUM tim tum!
RUM tiddle iddle iddle RUM tim tum!
RUM tiddle iddle iddle RUM tim tum!
And now my little rhyme is done!
get em mad
....40 hours a week..????
What IS questionable is, why pay a TiVo subscription when a tuner device and Media Center can do SO much more for SO much less.
Have you never heard of delayed viewing
Aereo really doesn't amke any sense
You don't get it
Where did the 40 hours a week come from? My wife and I usually watch shows we enjoy maybe a total of 10-15 hrs a week. This cannot keep up with the broadcast rate so we time shift. With 10-20 episodes in a season and five or six shows to watch, 40 hours of storage won't cut it as we often get close to the ~120 hour limit on our DVR -- happening about now as rerun season is about to start.
There is no rerun season anymore!
We just went through a "rerun season".
We only watch an hour-and-a-half a night, and I record quite a few shows, but we have NOTHING on the DVR to watch tonight.
I think their point is....
40 hours too much?
40 hours may well be far too small for two reasons:
1. Households with lots of people. Divide 40 by more than 2 or 3 and that is not much per person per week.
2. There are while periods (usually around major holidays) where there is not much good on...
Pay for your TV
If a cable franchise has to pay retransmission fees, why shouldn’t Aereo? Why do they expect a free ride?
This whole thing reminds me of what Napster tried to do all those years ago.
Co-Opted Technology
Re: If a cable franchise has to pay retransmission fees, why shouldn’t Aere
I'm sure in the end they will have to pay, or actually the consumer will.
Legally speaking, it's quite different
Since the United States Citizen owns the airwaves, FOX and CBS use the over the air systems and come under FCC regs. If the antenna are really owned by end users, citizens or what ever you want to call them, it's more of a sharing system, managed by a company.
Throws copyright into a whole new tizzy.
Good fun to see how this will turn out.
If