Why Windows 8 may be the ideal tablet OS for healthcare
Summary: Windows 8-based tablets might have a substantial role to play in healthcare.
Earlier this week, I ran an interview with two healthcare professionals about the iPad mini. In it, they made the case that the iPad mini can be tranformative for healthcare.
As I've come to learn more about Windows 8, I've been thinking that Windows 8-based tablets might also have a very substantial role to play in healthcare. In fact, Windows 8 tablets might, in some cases, be even more appropriate to healthcare than iOS or Android devices.
I love my iPad and iPhone, and my husband really enjoys his Nexus 7, so this isn't about whether I like one environment more than another. What it is about is about security and vertical integration.
Hospital computing (and all healthcare computing for that matter) necessitates security as a top priority. From a defensive perspective, the cost -- from both a legal and PR point of view -- of a major breach (or even a comparatively minor HIPAA or HITECH violation) could be extensive. From a patient care perspective, we want patients to know that their records are being kept as secure as possible.
Windows 8, like Windows 7 before it, integrates beautifully with Windows server technologies. Windows 8 adds additional security features and works smoothly with Exchange, SharePoint, Windows 2008 and Windows 2012 Server. Of particular interest to healthcare professionals, Windows 8 also supports Microsoft Lync secured messaging, so IM messages that go between medical professionals can be both instant and rock-solid secure.
Beyond that, the much-maligned so-called Metro modern UI tiled Start screen interface can offer substantial benefits to medical professionals. Because the tiles are live, they can provide an at-a-glance update into many of the details a medical professional might need to know.
There are some issues I see standing in the way of adoption of Windows 8 in healthcare, but I think we'll see answers in the near-term. The biggest is the cost, weight, and size of Windows 8 tablets. As Dr. Velasco said in the article about how the iPad mini can transform mobile healthcare, the iPad mini can fit in a lab coat pocket. As yet, no Windows 8 tablet can accomplish this feat (although Windows phones can).
Overall, I'm quite enthusiastic about how Windows -- a vertically-integrated ecosystem -- can solve many of the IT problems we face in healthcare, and how this new mobile component could fit right in to that environment with the proper form factor.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
You can see the future?
Tell me, though, were you born a troll or did you have to practice?
Why Windows 8 may be the ideal tablet OS for healthcare
It's all about the software
2010: "10 Ways Apple's iPad Is Changing Healhcare"
Source
2.5 years ago.
Guess it's not working out too well considering
I Don't Know Where You're Looking At...
I would really start to wonder if I was Microsoft...
predictions
Remember in 1986 when Apple was in all the schools?
DrJohnnyRay...the answer is simple. If win7 works with those systems....
I know this site is filled wtih ABMers but why is everyone making such a big deal about the interface? Google has created almost exactly the same UI in some of it's apps and Apple is started to use tiled interfaces as well. I just saw an iPhone ad last night that showed applications with tiled UIs. Seems to be the future, not the old page of icons you have to thumb and thumb through to find what you need and then it's tedious at best to go between 2 applications.
yes they will
no way
that's the power of Foss.
6 trolls by the usual suspects
Linux Geek we allow for the entertainment aspect alone. The others, well fear makes you do silly things, as you can see by their posts.
Do you know what the term "troll" means? Clearly not.
Just like yours.
Feel free to point out a SINGLE example of where I have trolled
From that, and the rest of your comment, it is abundantly clear that you don't have the first clue what the term means. Which is telling, considering how easy it would have been to check before you posted.
If you HAD bothered to check your understanding of the term, you would have run head frist into this definition:
"someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response.
Trolling is posting irrelevant nonsense for the sole purpose of riling people up. It is NOT posting with minimal mannars. Almost every post I have ever made on ZDNet is in reply to some piece of errant information, and replies to that post directly. I almost never post first, but are in direct response to someone else's post, and directly reply to the points made. They are therefore, by definition, NOT irrelevant. In addition, I match my tone to the tone of the O.P.. If the O.P. posts in a courteous mannar, they get a similar response. If they post factually incorrect information masquerading as an authoritative response, they get a reply that does not suffer fools gladly. NONE of this is being a troll.
"just asking."
Um, no, you never actually asked anything.
^^^ this one?
I hope not
But it would fit in nicely.....
Interesting you would mention pediatric care areas
just saying...