Why Yahoo's 'no home working' rule will lead us back into the office
Summary: Yahoo wants its staff to work in the office, innovating and collaborating face to face instead of working from home. What's wrong with that?
This week, the news surfaced that Yahoo's CEO Marissa Mayer wants the staff to come into the office and stop working from home. The news has not gone down well with workers at Yahoo.

AllThingsD published the text of the memo a few days ago:
Yahoo proprietary and confidential information — do not forward
Yahoos,
Over the past few months, we have introduced a number of great benefits and tools to make us more productive, efficient, and fun. With the introduction of initiatives like FYI, Goals, and PB&J, we want everyone to participate in our culture and contribute to the positive momentum. From Sunnyvale to Santa Monica, Bangalore to Beijing — I think we can all feel the energy and buzz in our offices.
To become the absolute best place to work, communication and collaboration will be important, so we need to be working side by side. That is why it is critical that we are all present in our offices. Some of the best decisions and insights come from hallway and cafeteria discussions, meeting new people, and impromptu team meetings. Speed and quality are often sacrificed when we work from home. We need to be one Yahoo, and that starts with physically being together.
Beginning in June, we're asking all employees with work-from-home arrangements to work in Yahoo offices. If this impacts you, your management has already been in touch with next steps. And, for the rest of us who occasionally have to stay home for the cable guy, please use your best judgment in the spirit of collaboration. Being a Yahoo isn't just about your day-to-day job, it is about the interactions and experiences that are only possible in our offices.
Thanks to all of you, we've already made remarkable progress as a company — and the best is yet to come.
Jackie
I often work from home and see nothing wrong with the memo. If a company is paying me for my time, then it should be able to see me in the office on a regular basis. Yahoo wants its workers to collaborate face to face. There is nothing wrong with that
I get energised and fired up with ideas and new ways to do things when I am working in a team environment. It is much better than trying to innovate whilst being isolated from the rest of the group.
Google has advocated working face to face at its offices for a long time — and with free food for staff and their guests, laundry service, comfy seating areas, games, and other amenities, Googlers are often reluctant to go home.
Yahoo ex- employees have said that the work-from-home culture led to people "slacking off like crazy". And Yahoo will know who these people are.
Yahoo's internal IT team will have a really good view on what workers are doing on a day-to-day basis. Internal IT will have logs detailing what internet activities employees are doing, what sites they visit, and how long they spend on each site, such as Facebook or Google.
Sophisticated monitoring might even show what search terms are being used for searches on Bing or Google, and how much time is spent on each search engine, as well as which locations prefer which search engines.
If you are angry about this "intrusion" into your private life, go and read your terms of employment.
If you are accessing the internet from a company-owned machine, through the company proxy servers, then the company has a right to check your activities.
Remote working — once in a while — can be productive. But it can lead to a sense of isolation and feeling excluded from daily goings on.
Working in an office brings a much stronger sense of "belonging" and community than working remotely — even for one day a week. It can significantly increase the development of new ideas and innovation.
I have done both types of working, and much prefer the face-to-face bonding I get from working in an office with my team.
If Mayer wants to turn around the fortunes of Yahoo and become "the absolute best place to work", then Yahoos need to collaborate with each other — in person. Andrew Nusca, my ZDNet colleague, is right when he says that Mayer's goal is to "crush complacency in an 18-year-old internet company without an identity".
If you are working from home today, can you honestly say that you have not been complacent at some point during the day?
Are you sitting in your slouchy clothes, wandering away from the computer more often than you should to do home chores?
Or are you positively contributing to the company's success? If more companies looked at their internet activity logs, would we see more edicts to return to face-to-face, more productive working?
Perhaps the workers who are complaining the loudest are the ones who should take a long, hard look at just how much work they actually do.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
What happened to being green, and other issues...
What happened to moving to where you work?
Sometimes remote work works. Other times it does not. Sometimes, it is simply broken and you have to get rid of it and start over.
People cannot always afford to move closer
I don't think it is always about entitlement. Sometimes to attract talent you need to offer something besides money because you may not be able to pay them more and sometimes time is worth more than money for these people. Anyways at the end of the day Marissa can create any rules she wants and it will be up to the employee to decide if that is the environment they want to work in. I already know of a few talented coders at Yahoo! that are looking at new jobs. They don't want to WFH every day but a few days are important as they have kids and want to be able to take them to school or pick them up some of the days.
But talent at Yahoo! does not seem very strong.
So while it may have been working for some, I bet the work at home at Yahoo! is very broken. Yahoo! may loose a few good employees, they might loose several sub-standard employees; most will adapt.
And yes, it sometimes a hardship to move. Housing might be an issue either through refinancing like many have done or having recently moved in the last 6 years. There are desires to not to leave friends. You might no want to pull your kids out of a school.
But at the end of the day, you have to make a decision. If, due to massive mis-abuse in the past, a nice feature is lost to all, that is how it rolls.
The company is languishing because it lacks direction.
And that is what is happening.
This is not going to help Yahoo.
Exactly right
Definitely right
empoyees are at fault too
I don't doubt that there are a whooole lot of people who remained at yahoo because they're the "do the minimum" type employee riding it out until the end comes. Every year it felt that way at yahoo. Look at the revolving CEO door.
If I see this then I am sure current management sees this and is one of their way of weeding out those just sucking up resources and those who can still be productive. I suspect when the company is strong again, they'll roll out telecommuting again.
I personally, have a problem with many telecommuters where I am. They clearly are not "working". They miss meetings 90% of the time. They never answer emails right away unlike when they are in the office. Their phone goes to voice mail 50% of the time. Management obviously needs 50% of the blame here. But lets not make it sound like "oh because management doesn't know what direction to take its ok for employees to be slackers because they're not at fault".
Telecommuting
That strategy made sense
Sometime working from home is the only way to avoid meetings
If most companies would use Agile-style stand-up 30 min. meetings, that would be nice, but that's not something we have...
In-Office time = Non-Productive time
I work from home half the week, and while I realize the need to make the hour trip into the office, when I do that I waist 2 hours of productivity, in addition the the fact that I spend most of my time in the office "innovating", er, I mean in meetings.
When I'm at home in my "slouchy" clothes, I'm free to concentrate on the TASK. My work hours often fluctuate, and I do often take some breaks to take a walk and think. So I spend a little more time with my family in the morning, then work on my assignments in the afternoon/evening.
I work part time hours, mostly from home, and I get twice as much done as those in my office that work full time hours. I contrast this with my previous job, where they required me in the office, monitored my activities, and had us all sitting side-by-side in a room with no windows. It was occasionally invigorating, but mostly it became a bore and drudgery, and the team as a whole eventually disintegrated.
So, NO, working in the office, in the long term, is not very productive for programmers/knowledge workers. Give them flexibility of their time, require OCCASIONAL in-office time, and you'll find their productivity and desire to help the company blossom.
Waist does not equal Waste
What about work/life balance?
And it's not a question of whether you classify it "work" time "personal" time. Both are important and sitting in a care for two hours a day is a waste of time AND resources.
Work time or personal time.
If you're requiring
would only apply if
My, aren't we testy
There are people who don't like MS and go out of their way to avoid doing business with MS. MS can modify its policies in an effort to address the suspicion and mistrust; they can write it off as part of the cost of doing business the way they think it needs to be done (as Bill Gates did); or they can try to make up for it with PR campaigns, but complaining about it was ridiculous when Steve Ballmer did it in his "shocked and amazed" speech (at which point I lost all respect for him) and is ridiculous now.
Do something about it or not, but don't whine. People have the right to not like MS.