4 of 5Image
Wikileaks survey 4 image
Over 70 percent of UK readers thought that if Wikileaks is blocked by one country, an organisation in another country should host the site.
Wikileaks lost its domain name at the beginning of December, after DNS provider EveryDNS.net pulled its DNS services. For a short space of time, Wikileaks websites could only be accessed via numerical IP addresses, until Wikileaks moved its main site to a Swiss host. As a result of Wikileaks's difficulties, hundreds of mirror sites sprang up.
The majority of ZDNet readers around the world consistently said that Wikileaks should remain accessible by being hosted in different countries. ZDNet Germany readers were the most supportive, with 89 percent saying Wikileaks should be accessible online, while 53 percent of ZDNet Japan readers agreed. In the US, 57 percent of readers said that Wikileaks should remain accessible.
Organisations have come under attack from pro-Wikileaks supporters. PayPal, MasterCard and Visa have all had customer-facing sites taken offline by distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks.
Only a minority of readers think that DDoS is a legitimate form of protest. In the UK, 37 percent said that DDoS is legitimate. In France, 45 percent of readers believed it is legitimate to attack sites as part of a protest, while in the US the figure is 30 percent.