Will customers forget vendor lock-in concerns for Oracle?

Will customers forget vendor lock-in concerns for Oracle?

Summary: Are CIOs willing to let go worries about running a single-vendor environment for tighter integration across their IT infrastructure?

SHARE:
11

I'm in San Francisco this week covering Oracle's annual OpenWorld conference, where the war cry so far has centered around how companies can approach the vendor for all their IT needs, and I mean, all their IT needs.

Once just a software company, Oracle's value proposition changed when it acquired Sun Microsystems in January 2010 for US$7.4 billion, adding a strong history of hardware products to its portfolio.

During his opening keynote, themed "Hardware and software: engineered to work together", CEO Larry Ellison announced Oracle had added infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) to its cloud offerings, bumping up the vendor's cloud service tiers to three including software-as-a-service (SaaS) and platform-as-a-service (PaaS). Ellison said: "Our customers running our SaaS and PaaS solutions, they need to run certain kinds of custom applications and move some of their existing apps onto the cloud as well. The only way we can accommodate that is offer infrastructure-as-a-service in addition to SaaS and PaaS."

So, not only does Oracle offer a portfolio which spans across the entire software and hardware stack including servers, storage, CRM, ERP and social enterprise, it now plays in all three key cloud segments. The vendor would like its customers, and potential customers, to believe running an Oracle-only environment would offer better integration between the different enterprise applications, and between software and harware, as well as deliver performace that has been optimized across all its products and on the Oracle Cloud.

But would this value proposition be enough for customers to let go of common concerns about running a single-vendor environment and risk vendor lock-in?

At the ZDNet Asia IT Priorities panel discussion in February, a question from the audience touched on the impact of market consolidation and the increasing pressure for IT departments to streamline on one vendor. CIO of Courts Singapore, Bo Christensen, highlighted his concerns about having a single vendor drive his company's IT needs, applications and capabilities. "I will always want to have a range of companies...because technology keeps changing so what guarantee will I have that one large vendor can keep pace?" Christensen questioned.

YCH Group CIO Alec Ang, though, said his decision would depend on the type of applications deployed. It wouldn't make sense, for instance, to have three large ERP implementations, he noted, but said he would hunt out different options in market segments where several new technologies were still emerging.

These concerns were echoed in another ZDNet Asia panel discussion held last month on converged infrastructure. Panelists highlighted that CIOs generally were advised never to over-rely on one single vendor. It reduced their bargaining power and limited them to the technology that one vendor provided.

These are valid business concerns every CIO needs to seriously consider. And Oracle probably recognizes this too, since it also unveiled several new offerings for its partner ecosystem at the conference this week.

Will its proposition be compelling enough for companies? I think a lot would depend on how well Oracle is really able to integrate its software and hardware products. But it will likely face a tougher time in the cloud space which is still evolving, and that is still fairly crowded with market players and no clear cross-the-board market leaders.

As Ang pointed out, a single-vendor approach wouldn't make sense in market segments where new technologies are still emerging and different viable options are available.

Topics: IT Priorities, CXO, Oracle

About

Eileen Yu began covering the IT industry when Asynchronous Transfer Mode was still hip and e-commerce was the new buzzword. Currently a freelance blogger and content specialist based in Singapore, she has over 16 years of industry experience with various publications including ZDNet, IDG, and Singapore Press Holdings.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

11 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • OpenWorld?

    Am I the only one who sees the irony of a single source vendor marketing themselves at their own "OpenWorld" conference?
    digitalpaws
  • is it just me

    Hello, this is a really fas­ci­nat­ing web page and I have loved read­ing sev­eral of the arti­cles and posts con­tained upon the site, sus­tain the great work and hope to read a lot more excit­ing arti­cles in the time to come.
    timmy1987
  • No

    That is particularly true with Oracle.
    happyharry_z
  • Opensource?

    As I read this article I could only think of Apple. Once you become their prisoner, it's all over for you.
    BadDog40
    • So, companies with Microsoft on the desktop

      Microsoft on the server, Microsoft on the web server, Microsoft on the email server and Microsoft on the cloud is going to become prisoners of Apple if they use an iPad/iPhone. Uh-huh.
      baggins_z
  • Silly argument really..

    I don't care which ecosystem you use, you are locked in to it. The costs to change is just to big in all but extreme cases.
    NoAxToGrind
    • So why does MS try so hard...

      ...to prevent users, developers, and "partners" (aka vassals) from defecting? If you're right, that shouldn't be necessary.
      John L. Ries
    • They all do that.

      MS/Apple/Oracle are all equally guilty of having little hooks in their technology that make it hard to migrate somewhere else.
      bmonsterman
  • Sarcasm: It's not lock-in

    It's loyalty assurance. After all, successful companies have a fiduciary duty to fight the customer treason that eats away at their shareholder value.

    Did you think that free enterprise implied free consumers?
    John L. Ries
  • It's always a trade off

    Single vendor translates into easier integration. As long as you aren't being gouged you can save alot of money in development effort by using a single vendor. However....Oracle gouges..
    bmonsterman
  • Engagedots CRM

    Yes its like a single vendor approaching them self to the wider world.
    Engagedots CRM