Windows 8 interface's design heritage
Summary: Microsoft's new Windows 8 interface, formerly known as Metro, is a clear break from the ageing desktop metaphor. Is it the industry's way forward, or just confusing brand differentiation? Either way, it's got design-history cred.
Image 1 of 8

Microsoft's new interface for Windows 8 and Windows Phone 8, formerly known as Metro, is based on squares and rectangles of flat colour arranged on a seamless panoramic canvas; a complete break from the traditional desktop metaphor.
The new interface is a stylistic development of the look developed for Windows Phone 7, something that caused confusion when it was announced in 2010.
"When I first saw the Windows Phone UI ... I was genuinely surprised. The flatness of it, an awful lot of white space ... I mean, it was clearly a shift in direction from what we've been seeing on the other platforms," said Shane Morris, formerly a Microsoft user interface evangelist, but now a user experience designer with Automatic Studio.
"I literally thought that Microsoft was being very clever and not revealing the final user interface. Instead, it put in place these square, coloured placeholders where the user interface would be revealed," Morris told ZDNet.
But the interface was real, and the abandonment of the familiar desktop metaphor was also real. Microsoft believes that it's appropriate in the era of digital natives.
"We're at a point where our users are sufficiently confident with using information technology that they don't need the reassurance of those references to real-world objects. That would be Microsoft's argument," Morris said.
"That's why the new user interface has what a lot of this what we call chrome [borders, shading, textures, and the like on user interface elements] stripped out, the argument being we can just focus on the actual information now," he said.
"You manipulate the content itself. You drag it, you drop it, you poke it. As an old-school usability guy, I found that quite confronting. Traditionally, my job was to provide enough signals onscreen to communicate to users what you're supposed to do."
In his presentation at Microsoft TechEd 2012 this week, Morris showed how the Windows Phone 7 and Windows 8 interfaces have evolved from Microsoft's previous content-focused interfaces for Media Center and Zune.
"Those applications similarly don't have a lot of chrome, the focus on the content, there's a lot of animation, a lot of use of text," he said.
The inspiration for Microsoft's new visual style can be traced back to design schools from the middle of the 20th century, including the International Style or Swiss School, the Bauhaus movement, and motion graphics such as the cinematic title designs of Saul Bass, as well as the wayfinding signage used in airports and urban transit systems.
Stilgherrian attended Tech.Ed Australia 2012 as a guest of Microsoft.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
I like articles like this
Agreed.
I agree
Well put
Once you use it
Back to XP/Win7 mode
I do not like any of these on my desktop
So Microsoft is telling us to use a “content consumption” oriented user interface on our desktop to replace our productivity oriented interface because they think we should.
I think you are all quite confused on what content consumption means and what the desktop is supposed to do.
I personally do not want to work on a billboard oriented desktop. In the productivity space, Metro is more than useless it is counterproductive and extremely annoying.
There is nothing to get used about the new UI, I can use it as well as any other UI, but by using it I am less productive because it does have some serious flaws. So I will have to wait like so many other people, for this madness to pass, it is just another marketing wave Microsoft has unleashed trying to become more relevant to the masses that have no use for a productivity oriented desktop OSes.
"Content Consumption"? Where?
don't conflate the UI with hardware features
So, yes, if you want the great new feature which is actually independent of whichever UI had been used, you have to accept the new UI as well because MSFT only offers a prix fixe menu. No a la carte.
But
still missing the point
And that couldn't have been addressed in a purely Windows 7 UI? The settings changes for the taskbar in Windows 8 couldn't have been made without the new Start screen? It was impossible to MSFT to allow users configurability of the Start menu?
Hardly.
MSFT chose not to, just as it chose not to expand Excel with the former toolbar UI past 65K rows and 256 columns. And just as there were competing spreadsheets with more columns/rows but old style UIs, it's clear you never tried any alternative shells for Windows. There are a great many ways to do things differently on the Windows desktop.
Think first...
Obviously when you grow up and you have to work for a living you will understand in the meantime I will agree with you it is more fun to tweet on Windows 8, but I have no use for it.
P.S. You really don’t know that previous versions of Windows offer multi-monitor support?
Where?
Nope
Heck, Windows 8 doesn't even yet have working window manager, it is as terrible in multi-monitor environment like Windows 7 was.
Erm....
Nope
Gee.... no wonder Windows users can not get anything content actually done because they use evernote, fresh paint, onenote and mail kind apps...
And suddenly, content isn't created using Metro GUI, it is created using totally different kind GUI's.
Please enlighten us...
I've been using Windows 8 as my only OS for a few months now and I find it to be much more productive than any other version of Windows (since 3.1).
Or maybe…
Unless you are using your desktop as a tablet, which is rather difficult in my case since each of my monitors is 30” wide.
I have been trying Windows 8 since it came out as beta/preview you name it. Still I find no point in running this OS on anything other than a tablet. Unless of course you bought the wrong type of computer and what you really needed (and only capable of using) is a tablet, in that case Win8 is the perfect OS for your desktop.
Just make sure that you memorize all 1M shortcuts you need and avoid eating when sitting in front of your PC.
You didn't actually name any flaws...
Here is one of many…
Working happily on my desktop apps (e.g. Visual Studio), I want to select an application or a setting, I press the Window button and I switch to a 30” sea of rectangles. Context lost, eyes have to readjust, totally distracting from the work flow. An application goes full screen on a desktop if the user asks for that behaviour (or the form factor, i.e. tablet, needs it), otherwise it is idiotic and kills productivity.
Unless of course you believe Mr. Sinofsky’s telemetry data chosen and optimized to prove the marketing departments position, instead of trusting your own experience.
Oh I hear you say “you should pin what you want on the desktop so you can avoid the context switch”. If I have to do something to avoid it why are these stupid rectangles there in the first place?