Yes, of course tablets matter for business — here are seven reasons why
Summary: Tablets aren't a consumer toy any more, and soon they'll be taking over your office — so you’d better get ready.
Along with jetpacks and the paperless office, tablet computers have been just around the corner for at least 50 years, and Microsoft and others have spent the last decade trying to turn them from sci-fi fantasies into real business devices.
Apple got there first, of course, largely by ignoring the received wisdom and re-inventing the tablet as primarily a consumer — and content consumption — device. As a result, the market for tablets turned out to be massive — extending far beyond the worthy business niche that most tech companies were miopically trying to mine.
With the rise of BYOD, these tablets started leaking back into business, but rather as second-class items: companion devices and hangers on, relegated to the position of sidekick as a result of their consumer heritage.
Many managers have never been convinced that tablets have a place in business that goes beyond being a nice trophy gadget for executives and shiny bauble for salespeople making presentations. I still see a lot of comments describing tablets as toys that have no place in business.
But I think they're wrong. Touchscreens and tablets really do matter for business, and will herald a major shake-up of our work space. Here are a few reasons why:
Firstly, because Microsoft wants them to succeed. It's betting big on tablets and touchscreens, making them the heart of its future business strategy — and that means its enormous installed base of users better get used to the idea of swiping as well as typing.
Touch actually works this time around. After a decade or more of false dawns, touchscreen technology works very, very well and it's cheap. If you can get a Nexus 7 for £199, then why would you not begin considering such touch-centric devices for use in business?
Touchscreen and keyboard actually work better than a keyboard and mouse. There's a smattering of research that suggests using a touchscreen as your only input method makes you less productive because the virtual keyboards are slower than physical ones. And touch input can be less accurate and more tiring, too.
But add a physical keyboard into the mix, and touch really works. Ok, so the first few days using a touchscreen does make you feel a bit like a character from Minority Report, but it's far more intuitive than keyboard and mouse. I think it's also more efficient.
I've been using a tablet (the Surface RT) on and off for the last month or so and the combination of touchscreen and keyboard feels very natural, despite the odd fat-fingered error. So much so that going back to the old keyboard, mouse and dumbscreen combo feels stultifying. Touch creates a much more intimate relationship between me and what I write — less mediated than using the mouse and keyboard.
It's what everyone is already buying. The PC era is over, even though the PC industry might be hoping that we are moving into a PC-plus era, where we'll all have some kind of PC alongside a number of other devices in other form factors.

But it's looking increasingly likely that we're moving into a post-PC world where the PC becomes the minority form factor. As a result...
It's what your new staff will expect. Everyone has seen those YouTube clips of kids trying to swipe a magazine. That's your workforce a few years from now. And you thought it was irritating when everyone wanted an iPhone.
Touch computing has changed my work dynamic. Work has always been a lean-forward experience. What I've found is that using a tablet has made work a lean-back experience as well (in contrast to watching TV, which for many has gone from lean-back to lean-forward.)
I'm pretty convinced that after 50 years of waiting, tablets here to stay
An example: I came across a piece of useful research when writing this column. Instead of leaning in I detached the Surface from its keyboard and sat back to read the research, and to think. It might seem like a trivial difference but for me it was revelatory because that form factor change altered the way I consumed that piece of content. If a new technology can make your staff more productive and more creative, why would you not use it?
Tablets may even change where we sit. The office was originally designed around immovable adding machines and typewriters and hasn't really been rethought since then, even as the devices have become lighter, cheaper and more portable. Even hot-desking just recreates the same cubical culture, without the clutter. Tablets and touchscreens could make for a much more open and collaborative culture, if you let them.
Of course, none of this means that the desktop or notebook will disappear overnight and they will both still have useful niches. And it could be decades before the real impact emerges. But I'm pretty convinced that after 50 years of waiting, tablets here to stay.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
It is PC+ not post PC
Only if you ignore installed base, PC market is saturated, tablet market not so. Tablets may well replace notebooks for may users where portabilty is a key factor. But for many people and tasks a desktop PC remains the optimal and best VFM solution.
Re: Only if you ignore installed base
tablets have their place
Agreed
But many functions would be painful to perform on a single, 10" screen. Anyone who does visual layouts, or system administration multiple, big screens to do their job.
Everything has its place.
Hardly Taking Over
Even the graph you show already has the rate of increase in tablet share relative to notebooks slowing down in 2013 and leveling off in 2017. So that's not a take-over.
Post PC era is a myth
Re: In enterprise, post PC era won't happen in the near future.
After all, those same IT departments in the 1980s saw no need for PCs either, it was the employees who brought them in via BYOD back then.
The PC replaced the mainframe because
The tablet is better than the PC only when you are not sitting down or when you don't have a proper work surface.
Touch is not an advantage. Touch is a necessity feature to overcome a major deficiency - small display area. On a small display area, repeated zooming and panning are required in order to get any trivial work done, and touch at this moment is the best UI for this need.
Hence, the successor to the PC is not the tablet. It has not been invented yet.
The mainframe numbers never down, but only increased.
Mainframes dominate the backend for big businesses, and nothing will replace them in the near future.
Replaced the Mainframe?
We have actually made the mainframe invisible, which may be why we call it the "cloud" these days: multiple mainframe-sized PC-like devices in different locations. And before that, some companies had already distributed their mainframe applications into multiple locations. But the mainframe's FUNCTION has not been replaced.
Re: The PC didn't replace the mainframe
How many companies were selling mainframes in 2012? How many in 1982?
SueBill: I think you are confused
Rick
Re: No PC has more MIPS, more memory or more storage than a modern mainfram
"Touch is not an advantage..." ???? Come again????
Because You do not use touch to an advantage, this disqualifies you as an expert on the subject.
Desktop applications, when written with touch optimization, can add a high degree of productivity.
Think "scroll down" and "Next Page" and translate to swipe.
Check boxes, radio buttons both work much better with touch.
Data entry can be improved. Instead of entering dates and times it can easily be done in a couple of taps if designed correctly.
Point of Sale is a good example. What is the difference between generating a PoS Ticket vs. an Invoice? CRM / Contact Management is an ideal touch app.
Tablets are cool but not so fast...
"Not so Fast" applies to current Tablets
The Surface Pro "tablet" will be my next desktop machine.
A tablet with an i5 processor qualifies as a desktop.
I need another desktop machine. My priority is energy efficiency balanced with computational power. I typically build a machine using the most powerful processor no more 35 Watts max TDP.
I recently priced out building a system with a mobile 3rd Gen i3, 8 GB RAM and 150GB SSD.
Now with a "tablet" like the Surface Pro I assume will use an i5 with a max TDP of 17 Watts and will have enough horse power to run AutoCAD.
Because the Surface Pro is only $200 more than the desktop system (with no OS) I was going to build cost, I am waiting for the Surface Pro and will use it as my main desktop machine.
The 10" display will not be used.
Worst case I will connect my three 24"(1200x1920) monitors using USB video adapters, as I am not familiar with the Surface Pro's video output. I currently use one DisplayLink USB video adapter and it's performance is as good as the two displays connected to my Radeon 5670. And the DisplayLink adapters use surprisingly less CPU (negligible for typical use) than originally anticipated. When stressed with a graphic benchmark, the CPU for the DisplayLink driver will hit 15%.
I do a fair amount of programming and the compile time using a 2nd Gen i3 has been more than satisfactory. I also do PC Board layout and the i3 has no problem. I expect the i5 in the Surface Pro will do even better.
almost there
Already There!
http://www.zdnet.com/lenovo-thinkpad-tablet-2-first-impressions-review-7000010803/
Alternative Solutions:
http://www.geek.com/laptop-docking-station/
almost there
Yes, of course tablets matter for business — here are seven reasons why