Search
  • Videos
  • Windows 10
  • 5G
  • CES
  • Best VPNs
  • Cloud
  • Security
  • more
    • AI
    • TR Premium
    • Working from Home
    • Innovation
    • Best Web Hosting
    • ZDNet Recommends
    • Tonya Hall Show
    • Executive Guides
    • ZDNet Academy
    • See All Topics
    • White Papers
    • Downloads
    • Reviews
    • Galleries
    • Videos
    • TechRepublic Forums
  • Newsletters
  • All Writers
    • Preferences
    • Community
    • Newsletters
    • Log Out
  • Menu
    • Videos
    • Windows 10
    • 5G
    • CES
    • Best VPNs
    • Cloud
    • Security
    • AI
    • TR Premium
    • Working from Home
    • Innovation
    • Best Web Hosting
    • ZDNet Recommends
    • Tonya Hall Show
    • Executive Guides
    • ZDNet Academy
    • See All Topics
    • White Papers
    • Downloads
    • Reviews
    • Galleries
    • Videos
    • TechRepublic Forums
      • Preferences
      • Community
      • Newsletters
      • Log Out
  • us
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Europe
    • India
    • United Kingdom
    • United States
    • ZDNet around the globe:
    • ZDNet France
    • ZDNet Germany
    • ZDNet Korea
    • ZDNet Japan

How to talk about the singularity and look smart doing it

10 of 16 NEXT PREV
  • We'll make great pets

    We'll make great pets

    Scientists, furturists and big thinkers increasingly worry about a key point in the future of computing: the singularity, the moment when mankind could be mentally dwarfed by its own machines, and we become an inferior species.

    Utopians see this as the crossover point, where consciousness ascends to a higher state. Dystopians see-well, Skynet. Either way, the singularity is a very real possibility to some very smart people. Here's everything you need to know.

    Published: October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT)

    Photo by: iStock

    Caption by: Jefferson Reid

  • We've been fearing this for a while

    We've been fearing this for a while

    The word singularity was first used, in this tech sense, in 1958 by mathematical physicist John von Neumann. He was in a conversation with Manhattan Project math wiz Stanislaw Ulam.

    Summarizing the concept, Ulam noted the "ever accelerating progress of technology...which gives the appearance of approaching some essential singularity in the history of the race, beyond which, human affairs, as we know them, could not continue."

    And consider: If tech innovation seemed blindingly fast in '58, it's done nothing but speed up since.

    Published: October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT)

    Photo by: Vytenis Slajus/iStock

    Caption by: Jefferson Reid

  • Moore's Law is key evidence

    Moore's Law is key evidence

    Singularity acolytes invariably back up their theory by citing Moore's Law. Postulated in 1965 by Intel co-founder Gordon E. Moore, the law says that computer processing power doubles roughly every two years.

    If your brain's power were to double every two years for 50 years, you'd be way smarter by now. Possibly even superintelligent, rule-the-world smarter.

    Published: October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT)

    Photo by: iStock

    Caption by: Jefferson Reid

  • 21st century visionaries think it's coming

    21st century visionaries think it's coming

    "We need to be super careful with AI. Potentially more dangerous than nukes," Elon Musk has Tweeted."Hope we're not just the biological boot loader for digital superintelligence.

    "Unfortunately, that is increasingly probable."

    Published: October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT)

    Photo by: James Leynse/Corbis

    Caption by: Jefferson Reid

  • We've got a good 30 years left

    We've got a good 30 years left

    The term "technological singularity" was popularized by mathematician and sci-fi writer Vernor Vinge.

    Vinge estimates the singularity could be upon us by 2045. Yikes! Or hooray, depending.

    Published: October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT)

    Photo by: Andrew Ostrovsky/iStock

    Caption by: Jefferson Reid

  • Unless we've got only 14 years

    Unless we've got only 14 years

    If Vinge popularized the concept, he's not the singularity squad's biggest cheerleader.

    That would be futurist Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity Is Near (2005), who thinks the big day could be here as soon as 2029 and that by 2045 we will have increased our brainpower a billion fold.

    Published: October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT)

    Photo by: iStock

    Caption by: Jefferson Reid

  • Actually, make that five

    Actually, make that five

    At the 2012 Singularity Summit (yes there is such a thing) Oxford research fellow Stuart Armstrong presented some results from his survey of experts and lay people predicting the date of the singularity.

    Happily, they were all over the map--with the vast majority in the range of 5 to 100 years.

    Published: October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT)

    Photo by: iStock

    Caption by: Jefferson Reid

  • Singularity believers are no crackpots

    Singularity believers are no crackpots

    "There will be no distinction, post-Singularity, between human and machine or between physical and virtual," Kurzweil writes.

    Sound crazy? Hey, he's head of engineering at Google, so what could he know?

    Published: October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT)

    Photo by: Rick Friedman/Corbis

    Caption by: Jefferson Reid

  • The singularity may need our brains to work

    The singularity may need our brains to work

    Advances in DNA research, digital brain modeling and nanotechnology suggest that one possible way for the singularity to arrive is through mind uploading into a computer simulation or physical robot container.

    It's mostly speculative at this point, but only mostly; the Blue Brain project in Switzerland is currently working on a complete, simulated mapping of a human brain.

    Published: October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT)

    Photo by: iStock

    Caption by: Jefferson Reid

  • Not everyone's a believer

    Not everyone's a believer

    Cognitive science professor Steven Pinker told the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers that there isn't the slightest reason to believe in a coming singularity.

    The fact that you can imagine something, he notes, "is not evidence that it is likely or even possible. Look at domed cities, jet-pack commuting, underwater cities, mile-high buildings and nuclear-powered automobiles--all staples of futuristic fantasies when I was a child that have never arrived."

    Published: October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT)

    Photo by: iStock

    Caption by: Jefferson Reid

  • istock000026970562small-2.jpg

    Geometry of Mind series. Design composed of human head and fractal elements as a metaphor on the subject of human mind, consciousness, brain, reason, logic and creativity

    Published: October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT)

    Photo by: Andrew Ostrovsky

    Caption by: Jefferson Reid

  • There are a lot of disaster scenarios

    There are a lot of disaster scenarios

    But if the tech singularity does happen, the aftermath is fraught with perils, according to Nick Bostrom, author of the best-selling, Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies (2014).

    Post singularity, Bostrom theorizes that machines could swiftly advance through recursive self-improvement, creating a subsequent intelligence explosion--smart machines creating smarter machines and so on.

    Published: October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT)

    Photo by: iStock

    Caption by: Jefferson Reid

  • As in, we all could die

    As in, we all could die

    Bostrom sees the prospect of runaway A.I. as a possible extinction event for us, potentially more dangerous than nukes. "Before the prospect of an intelligence explosion," he writes, "We humans are like small children playing with a bomb."

    Published: October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT)

    Photo by: iStock

    Caption by: Jefferson Reid

  • Even Hawking is kinda worried about it

    Even Hawking is kinda worried about it

    Taking a break from solving the riddle of black holes and/or denying they exist and/or insisting that they do, brilliant theorist Stephen Hawking recently jumped into the fretting fray, suggesting that creating superintelligence could actually prove to be a super stupid move.

    Published: October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT)

    Photo by: Matt Dunham/Corbis

    Caption by: Jefferson Reid

  • "The end of the human race"

    "The end of the human race"

    "The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race," Hawking told the BBC. "Once humans invent artificial intelligence, it would take off on its own, and re-design itself at an ever increasing rate. Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn't compete, and would be superseded."

    Published: October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT)

    Photo by: Sergey Tryapitsyn/iStock

    Caption by: Jefferson Reid

  • There's a school for that

    There's a school for that

    If all of this is a bit too much to assimilate, fear not. There's a place where you can get yourself schooled in exponential tech. At Singularity University, located at NASA Research Park in Silicon Valley, you can learn on a campus that includes a giant wind tunnel, a huge supercomputing center and a flight simulator. Cool.

    Champion of the singularity movement Ray Kurzweil is co-founder and chancellor of Singularity U., which offers programs in A.I. & Robotics, Biotech & Bioinformatics, Nanotechnology and much more.

    Catch their flavor at the Singularity News Hub, where you'll find stories like "Hacking Talent in the Age of the Exponential Human" and "Why Email Is Broken and What Will Replace It."

    Published: October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT)

    Photo by: iStock

    Caption by: Jefferson Reid

10 of 16 NEXT PREV
Jefferson Reid

By Jefferson Reid | October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT) | Topic: Big Data Analytics

  • We'll make great pets
  • We've been fearing this for a while
  • Moore's Law is key evidence
  • 21st century visionaries think it's coming
  • We've got a good 30 years left
  • Unless we've got only 14 years
  • Actually, make that five
  • Singularity believers are no crackpots
  • The singularity may need our brains to work
  • Not everyone's a believer
  • istock000026970562small-2.jpg
  • There are a lot of disaster scenarios
  • As in, we all could die
  • Even Hawking is kinda worried about it
  • "The end of the human race"
  • There's a school for that

Computers are smarter than you think, but will they soon think smarter than you? Plenty of big names in science say so...and that it's only a matter of when.

Read More Read Less

Not everyone's a believer

Cognitive science professor Steven Pinker told the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers that there isn't the slightest reason to believe in a coming singularity.

The fact that you can imagine something, he notes, "is not evidence that it is likely or even possible. Look at domed cities, jet-pack commuting, underwater cities, mile-high buildings and nuclear-powered automobiles--all staples of futuristic fantasies when I was a child that have never arrived."

Published: October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT)

Caption by: Jefferson Reid

10 of 16 NEXT PREV

Related Topics:

Digital Transformation Robotics Internet of Things Innovation Enterprise Software CXO
Jefferson Reid

By Jefferson Reid | October 20, 2015 -- 15:14 GMT (08:14 PDT) | Topic: Big Data Analytics

Show Comments
LOG IN TO COMMENT
  • My Profile
  • Log Out
| Community Guidelines

Join Discussion

Add Your Comment
Add Your Comment

Related Galleries

  • 1 of 3
  • Azure Synapse Analytics data lake features: up close

    Microsoft has added a slew of new data lake features to Synapse Analytics, based on Apache Spark. It also integrates Azure Data Factory, Power BI and Azure Machine Learning. These ...

  • Pitfalls to Avoid when Interpreting Machine Learning Models

    Modern requirements for machine learning models include both high predictive performance and model interpretability. A team of experts in explainable AI highlights pitfalls ...

  • When chatbots are a very bad idea

    Not every business problem can be solved by using chatbots. Here are some inappropriate uses for the AI tool.

  • How ubiquitous AI will permeate everything we do without our knowledge.

    Most of us do not know that we are using chatbots to talk to service agents, so how will we know that AI will be seamlessly interacting in with our future lives? ...

  • Streaming becomes mainstream

    The endless streams of data generated by applications lends its name to this paradigm, but also brings some hard to deal with requirements to the table: How do you deal with querying ...

  • Photos: How FC Barcelona uses football player data to win games

    FC Barcelona is focusing on data analysis to give it an edge on the soccer field and at the bank.

  • Heart and sleep apps that work with the Apple Watch

    If you want to track sleep and heart health, these apps will get you going.

ZDNet
Connect with us

© 2021 ZDNET, A RED VENTURES COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings | Advertise | Terms of Use

  • Topics
  • Galleries
  • Videos
  • Sponsored Narratives
  • Do Not Sell My Information
  • About ZDNet
  • Meet The Team
  • All Authors
  • RSS Feeds
  • Site Map
  • Reprint Policy
  • Manage | Log Out
  • Join | Log In
  • Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Site Assistance
  • ZDNet Academy
  • TechRepublic Forums