Analyst: Get ready for all-in-one app stores

Analyst: Get ready for all-in-one app stores

Summary: Amid launch of various PC app stores to complement mobile counterparts, Springboard Research analyst believes a one-stop app shop for consumers, regardless of device type, will emerge in near future.

SHARE:

With more devices equipped to access app stores for content, the market will see the emergence of an all-in-one app store able to recognize the type of device used and push apps relevant to that platform, observes an analyst who points to major players such as Apple and Google which are heading in that direction.

Bryan Wang, Asia-Pacific associate vice president of connectivity at Springboard Research, noted that consumers today own multiple devices and would want to be able to share their applications across these devices to have a seamless mobile Internet experience.

"We do believe that there will be a market for one-stop app shops able to recognize the device accessing it and push relevant content to end-users," Wang said in an e-mail interview.

To this end, he pointed to operators such as Apple and Google which he said were already heading in that direction. With Apple launching its Mac App Store on Jan. 6 and Google unveiling its Chrome Web Store a month earlier on Dec. 7, both companies are extending the mobile app environment into the desktop arena, he added.

"[Opening up these desktop app stores] is one of the steps for Apple and Google to move to a one-stop shop direction," the Springboard analyst said. "When PC app stores get larger market traction in the next year or two, we think it would be natural [for such vendors] to have their current mobile and desktop app stores combined."

Wang noted that Apple and Google currently are the only two operators that have "the capability to attract large volumes of customers in the next couple of years", a component that is necessary for a one-stop app shop to flourish.

The potential of a one-stop app shop also drew a positive response from Malcolm Lu, a product packaging designer, and a user of Apple's MacBook Pro, iPad slate device and Google's Chrome Web Store.

He told ZDNet Asia that he is "for the idea" of having an all-in-one app store as it would help him save time in looking over apps that are compatible with his respective devices.

Multi platforms not so soon
Lu, however, said it is "doubtful" a "universal" app store that is able to cut across different platforms and devices will be available any time soon.

He noted that mobile platform operators today are focused only on introducing and maintaining their own respective app stores, such as Apple with the iTunes App Store and Research In Motion with its BlackBerry App World. And this trend does not seem to be ending in the near future, he added.

Furthermore, there are differences in programming apps for the various mobile platforms and multiple devices that apps run on, making it "harder to develop a universal app store", he noted.

Wang agreed that universal app stores will not see light of day in the near future. He noted that in order to create a successful platform- and device-agnostic one-stop app store, the operator must already have an established brand name and customer buy-in for its existing services.

The operator should also have a multi-vendor, multi-technology approach in its business strategy in order to want to create the one-stop app store to begin with, and there are not many such companies in the market today, he added.

Wang identified Facebook and Samsung as two players that could potentially fulfill one or both factors, but whether the companies would eventually set up a universal app store remains to be seen.

Industry trends appear to support these observations. Besides smartphones, tablets and desktops, carmakers are also jumping onto the app store bandwagon, further complicating the app store landscape.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday that automobile manufacturers such as General Motors and Toyota have announced plans to transform dashboards into Internet-connected vehicles. General Motors, for instance, expanded its OnStar system, which was first developed to provide directions and emergency services, to include apps that access the car system and push information such as vehicle diagnostics to car owners.

According to Gartner analyst, Thilo Koslowski, the auto industry's focus on apps comes as carmakers look for new ways to differentiate their products from the competition. He said in the Wall Street Journal report: "Internet-connected autos will be among the fastest-growing segments in four years." Koslowski also predicted that more than half of all new premium vehicles in the United States will support apps by 2013 and mass-market cars will reach that level in 2016.

Topics: SMBs, Apps, Mobile OS, Mobility, Software, Telcos

Kevin Kwang

About Kevin Kwang

A Singapore-based freelance IT writer, Kevin made the move from custom publishing focusing on travel and lifestyle to the ever-changing, jargon-filled world of IT and biz tech reporting, and considered this somewhat a leap of faith. Since then, he has covered a myriad of beats including security, mobile communications, and cloud computing.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

2 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Readers may want to check out Mimvi at: http://www.mimvi.com
    They are ahead of the game...multi-platform search and recommendation for mobile and web apps.
    hector7
  • This would be against Apple policy, they'd never permit it as it encourages people to 'look elsewhere'.

    In a free market people are already 'free' to look at different App marketplaces when online, and they are also free to lock themselves into a closed garden if that is what they want (and many consumers do want this 'safety net' so to speak).

    A meta-garden is no Eden.

    The current model does not breach anti-competitive business laws, in my eyes, and it would be incredibly foolish to do this.

    1) It undoes prior marketing investments that gained market share, for each party.

    2) None of the parties want this, they each want to compete for the sale, then use long term contracts (tied to devices) to 'effectively' lock people into their marketplace. (Which is still competitive within the architecture it is designed for).

    3) Maybe in another 10 to 15 years this 'could' work, but so long as various patents and prior investments in marketing are 'active' I wouldn't count on it any time soon.

    The existing market is competitive, don't encourage people to [expletive deleted] with it!
    scott2010au