Apple v. Samsung: What are the most reliable smartphones on the market?
Summary: The latest report released by FixYa suggests that although Apple's iPhone comes with a premium price tag, you do get what you pay for in terms of reliability.
What is the most reliable smartphone currently on the market?

Samsung's Galaxy models? Apple's iPhone 5? Or how about a Nokia or Motorola offering? According to FixYa, a community-based body that regularly breaks down gadgets and issues repair reports about consumer products, smartphones may be useful, but with the rapid product cycle and constantly changing expectations of consumers, problems can emerge with the hardware.
Most of us have preferences when it comes to smartphones and tablet models, whether you look for security and encryption, speed, battery life or camera features. However, no model is perfect -- FixYa finding that Motorola tends to bloat their products with unnecessary software, Samsung smartphones are dogged by microphone issues, Nokia has a "laggy" interface, whereas Apple's iPhone comes equipped with a number of battery issues.
Pitting Apple, Samsung, Motorola and Nokia head-to-head, the FixYa team have compared the Apple iPhone, Motorola Droid, Samsung Galaxy, and Nokia Lumia smartphone lines. The report says that Apple's iPhone is three times more reliable than its closest rival, Korean firm Samsung, as well as being 25 times more reliable than Motorola's Droid.
The information below compares the most persistent problems with each device. By combining and analyzing data from 722,558 combined problem impressions -- in other words, consumer problems which have been posted either through the organization's website or mobile app and then adding marketshare data from StatCounter, the "Smartphone Reliability Report" has assigned each manufacturer a reliability score, relative to their market share and reported gadget problems.
All in all, FixYa has given Apple a reliability rating of 3.47 and Samsung 1.21, whereas Nokia and Motorola fall behind with ratings of 0.69 and 0.13 respectively. The main trends for each smartphone model are documented below:
Apple

Apple dominated the reliability tests with the fewest number of problems in relation to the iPad and iPhone maker's estimated marketshare, although most were related to battery life. However, the interface, camera and app store still make sure that Apple remains a key favorite for smartphone users. A recent report by Strategy Analytics which suggested the iPhone 5 managed to become the top selling model in Q4 2012.
Reports suggested that iPhone users enjoyed the "sleekness and simplicity" of the Apple interface, and although complaints cropped up, most technical issues rarely became a roadblock for longer than a week or so.
However, many consumers still seeking ways to help conserve their iPhone's battery life, a complaint which took hold after the launch of the iPhone 4S.
Samsung

Samsung, on the other hand, came in behind its rival with the second-highest reliability score. Users approved the Samsung Galaxy's interface across all models, but hardware issues including the microphone and speakers remained cause for complaint.
One element which raised very few complaints, however, was the battery life of Samsung Galaxy SIII smartphones, although the Samsung Galaxy Nexus performed far more poorly in this category.
Nokia, who was granted the third lowest reliability score, tended to be slower to load than other smartphone models, according to 35 percent of consumers. In addition, 20 percent of consumers were frustrated at the sparse application ecosystem with Windows Phone, although this is slowly improving. 15 percent of users reported failures when it came down to battery life, and 15 percent found that Nokia's Lumia smartphone sometimes becomes too hot.
However, Nokia uses did report that they appreciated the durability of the Nokia Lumia's screen, and the "Live tiles" feature on the homescreen was a great addition.
Motorola has the lowest marketshare of these smartphone manufacturers and also was given the lowest reliability score. Users of Motorola products have been dogged by a plethora of issues -- with 136,436 problem impressions reported on FixYa -- ranging from the audio hardware to software. 30 percent of users reported problems with preinstalled apps, or "bloatware" which cannot be removed, 25 percent said they experienced issues with Motorola touchscreens, and 20 percent complained about speaker quality. In addition, 15 percent of users reported problems with the quality of Motorola's Droid camera.
However, Motorola shone in terms of battery life as well as the overall phone's design.
"Smartphones are consistently being compared on a case by case basis, but no one has looked at the overall trends across a manufacturers’ entire smartphone line," said FixYa CEO and founder Yaniv Bensadon. "The result is an accurate and fair method, and a scaled approach to fairly compare these top companies to truly see who is the most reliable, and who is barely even competing."
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Junk Science
I agree. It almost sounds tailor made to have Apple come out on top.
Hardly
It is a joke, but I suppose they can't get real info easily; insurance claims and warranty claims. - the OEM's don't want to release that!!
This seems to be a "pet peeves" list?? Who cares about that?! My blackberry used to take a lifetime to turn back on, and it's app ecosystem was laughable, but it never broke down... It was therefore reliable in my instance.
My old old Samsung slide phone went wrong (didn't recognise being slid) so it got fixed on the warranty (4 weeks) 6 months later it did it again. Warranty had expired, so I opened it, found the cable had split where it folded on itself and bought a new cable off ebay and fixed it myself in 3days for 1.99. This was in my instance pretty p*ss poor reliability and poor repair service.
It's no different with the old iPods; their hard drives would always go wrong because they were not designed with living in pockets in mind. Over the years I owned four different models of iPod with hard drive. Everyone of them went wrong with hdd failure at some point. My 2007 has been replaced 3 times over the last 5 years. Yes some have been dropped, and I know that technically the hdd failure may be accidental damage, but most have happened through normal, day to day use. Very bad design, that lead to widespread un reliability, but the in store "repair"-read swap service softened the blow a bit (plus the ease of purchasing low repairs).
Nothing to do with making Apple on top: just compare the number of ...
Samsung phones have more than TWICE problem reports. There is nothing you can do about. It includes both software and hardware as it is, making general measure of overall user experience.
Did you see their methodology?
I know it is important to you that no matter what lies have to be told, that apple appear to be the best. It isn't, and this "study" doesn't show any different.
utter ridiculousness
I agree. Without that category, Apple would have gotten an even higher top score.
Yeah, complaing about not enough apps for an Android phone vs the iPhone
Well...
Samsung catching fire
Take away numbers involving app ecosystem
Whitney bitches everywhere...
How are these reliability issues?
Samsung device gets hot - it isn't reliable.
Nokia doesn't have enough apps - it isn't reliable.
Motorola has too many apps - it isn't reliable.
ifixit should go back to posting screenshots of the insides of things because this is ridiculous.
Samsung
Another rubbish report...
You see it as "rubbish"
Not that it isn't rubbish but I say that becasue there are many irrelevant issues brought up by the site - te number of apps for example does not affect the reliability of any device.
Only 1 target of that black eye
Hello..
APPLE Payroll
If this is based on comments/complaints/questions...
My god!