Apple's WiFiSlam acquisition won't beat Google Maps

Apple's WiFiSlam acquisition won't beat Google Maps

Summary: The move to boost its indoor maps system could bring it on par with Google's maps, but what's more attractive are the potential business opportunities.


With Apple's acquisition of an indoor-GPS company WiFiSlam, analysts note it will not have significant impact but merely place the U.S. consumer electronics giant's map system on par with Google Maps. However it could open up potential enterprise opportunities for retail and hospitality firms, though also raise potential privacy issues.


A spokesperson from the Cupertino-based company confirmed on Saturday it had acquired indoor-GPS company WiFiSlam, a Silicon Valley-based startup which develops ways for mobile apps to detect a phone user's location in a building using Wi-Fi signals.

This acquisition though, is not expected to have significant impact toward Apple as the Cupertino-based company is still struggling to recover from its "Maps fiasco", Loo Wee Teck, Euromonitor's global head of consumer electronics research, observed.

Ajay Singh, ICT Practice senior director at Frost & Sullivan Asia-Pacific agreed, explaining Apple still had a lot of ground to cover against Google Maps, especially after dropping the search giant's maps from its system.

Apple's purchase of WiFiSlam merely enhances the company's offerings and bring its map system on par with Google's indoor Google Maps, Loo explained.

A large part of the battle is also determined by the smartphones on which the maps will be loaded and utilized, Loo added. Android-based smartphones' "unassailable" lead over iPhones will not change with Apple's acquisition of WiFiSlam, he added.

Enterprise opportunities with potential privacy issues

The acquisition also brings enterprise opportunities, especially for firms retail and hospitality sector, Ajay pointed out.

Since WiFiSlam tracks people within buildings, companies can come up with apps which enhance their services with the use of data analytics, he pointed out. A restaurant, for example, can develop an app for consumers to track how many tables are available, or how many tables are finishing their food, he noted.

Apple can then get a cut of the potential sales from retailers while ensuring stickiness to map usage, and making consumers feel "special" with personalized offerings and messages, Loo added.

That said, once Apple is able to track its users on maps and push products to them, this brings up the issue of privacy, Ajay remarked.

Loo noted privacy issues would depend on how Apple's implementation and flexibility to allow users to select and choose the level of detail in which Apple and its retail partners can harness and use their private data, Loo added.

Consumers ZDNet Asia spoke to had mixed reactions to the potential privacy implications.

Student Jasper Tan said he was looking forward to product promotions and suggestions if he was near a retail store. "It would be even better if they offered mobile coupons and loyalty points if I were near a retail location," he said.

Housewife Lee Suet Hua had a different take though, noting the possibility of retailers developing apps, though WiFiSlam could track her "feels like an invasion of privacy". "For that reason, I will probably not use any retail apps associated with Apple Maps and WiFiSLAM," she said

As companies such as Apple, Google and Facebook provide free services to users, with the hope of making profit from avenues such as data mining, consumers cannot expect free usage while demanding for full privacy, Loo noted.

"Users have to make their own judgment when using them, while companies have to thread a tightrope to ensure they do not enrage the users," Loo said, adding Instagram created an uproar by changing its Terms of Services in December 2012, and Apple should strive to avoid that.

Topics: Apple, Apps, Privacy, Start-Ups

Ellyne Phneah

About Ellyne Phneah

Elly grew up on the adrenaline of crime fiction and it spurred her interest in cybercrime, privacy and the terror on the dark side of IT. At ZDNet Asia, she has made it her mission to warn readers of upcoming security threats, while also covering other tech issues.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • I disagree...

    All apps for the iPone that use push notifications automatically prompt you for permission to receive them. I usually refuse this option since I don't want to be inundated with them. Obviously you don't use an iPhone. Apple will not approve an App that doesn't allow you to turn a feature on or off either initially through a prompt when the App is installed or through System Preferences. Something tells me users of non-Apple phones won't be prompted when they first install the App on their mobile device. In my opinion, the Apple iPhone has fewer short comings then any of the alternatives out in the public domain.
  • Google Maps vs Apple Maps

    There is no question that the Apple Maps program was released prematurely, but the current status of it is greatly improved. Both Apple and Google maps apps have database errors, and Apple Maps lacks some of the locally usable data, such as bus schedules, that many city dwellers find useful. However, for the majority of users, Apple Maps is quite usable, and it continues to improve. The Apple 3D rendering from photos is vastly superior to Google Maps wire frame renderings, and seems to have more cities in its database. It is time to stop bashing Apple for this application, and take another look at it. While you are at it, try Google Maps side by side, and check out Hoover Dam, and the new bridge. I rest my case.
    • Apples vs Oranges

      I don't want Google Maps to have rich photo rendering. I want it to get me where I'm going efficiently without burning up gobs of mobile data. If I want to be wowed by imagery of the Hoover Dam and the new bridge I'll open up Google Earth. I rest my case.
  • It's getting hot in here!

    Well done to WifiSlam for getting in there. There are still other innovative indoor location companies out there which could compliment such services, for example sensewhere. Their integrated sensors/Wi-Fi/GPS/BT solution uses these hybrid technologies to complement each other in both automatic crowd sourcing and improving user experience everywhere including areas where there is poor or no signal coverage.
    Either way, the indoor positioning is clearly heating up and there is lots to get excited about in the near future!
    Anna Majek
  • free services

    It is silly to compare the reasons why Apple offers "free" services, with those of say Google.

    For Apple, this is a way to enhance the value of their devices. Apple makes money from device sales, not from "mining your data". With Apple, you pay up-front for the cost of those services, they are not "free".