Athlon XP/2600+: rendering and decoding performance

Summary:Despite the fact that 3D Studio Max 4.26 includes Pentium 4 optimisation, rendering of simple 3D objects (Kinetix Logo) with the 2.

Despite the fact that 3D Studio Max 4.26 includes Pentium 4 optimisation, rendering of simple 3D objects (Kinetix Logo) with the 2.53GHz Pentium is no faster than it is with an Athlon XP/2200+.

Rendering the architecture scene, which is recommended by the SPEC for measuring processor performance, pulls the new Athlon XP/2600+ further ahead of the fastest Pentium 4.

With the brand-new version 5 of 3D Studio Max, the picture changes in favour of the Pentium 4. Thanks to the improved SSE support in 3D Studio Max 5, the Pentium 4 finally gets its nose in front of the Athlon XP/2600+.

Pentium 4 optimisation can deliver the Intel processor’s full performance potential. When rendering with Lightwave 7b the 2.53GHz Pentium 4 is a good 67 percent faster than the new Athlon XP/2600+.

Although a program like Lightwave 7b can bring out the performance potential of the Pentium 4, Corel Bryce 5.01 is an example of how slow the platform can be with non-optimised applications. With this program, even a 2.53GHz Pentium 4 with PC1066 Rambus memory is well behind the AMD processors. The Athlon XP/2600+ is some 70 percent faster than the 2.53GHz Pentium 4.

When rendering with Maya 4, the 2.53GHz Pentium 4 is slightly faster than the 2.13GHz Athlon XP/2600+.

Older rendering software such as Cinema 4D includes no optimisation for the Pentium 4. Therefore the new Athlon XP/2600+ gets the best results on this test, despite its clock speed being 400MHz slower than that of the Pentium 4.

The Pentium 4 has no chance when it comes to decoding 64-bit RSA encryption with RC5. Here the Athlon processors are clearly faster. The Athlon XP/2600+ decodes 64 percent more keys than the 2.53GHz Pentium 4. The software’s developers have built Pentium 4 optimisation into their decryption tools, but the fact remains that the Pentium 4 has no hardware rotate function support, and is therefore slower than other X86 processors that support this feature.

Topics: Hardware, Processors, Reviews

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Related Stories

The best of ZDNet, delivered

You have been successfully signed up. To sign up for more newsletters or to manage your account, visit the Newsletter Subscription Center.
Subscription failed.