Battlefield 3 proves that the single-player first-person shooter is DEAD!

Dead. Dead! DEAD!!!

The single-player first-person shooter is dead.

Dead. Dead! DEAD!!!

Battlefield 3 certainly didn't kill it, but it sure proves that there is no longer any value in the single-player campaign, especially when it comes to AAA titles.

Exhibit A: TotalBiscuit's first impressions video:

I agree with EVERYTHING he says here:

  • Linear
  • Scripted
  • Way too many cut-scenes
  • Too much turret-style action
  • Boring
  • Simplistic
  • Unrealistic

From a visuals point of view, Battlefield 3 is awesome, but I think that somewhere down the line the developers forgot that they were making a game and made a Pixar-style war movie. I like cool visuals, but I also like playing a game ... Battlefield 3 only lets me do one of these.

Graphics isn't everything!

Bottom line, there's less and less entertainment value to be had from single-player campaigns. Probably the last game with a decent single-player campaign was Crysis 2. Before that it was probably Crysis.

The only decent first-person shooter single-player game out there is Arma II ... and I have high hopes for Arma III due out next year. Arma II certainly wasn't a AAA title, and it had a steep learning curve, but boy is it a lot of fun! You get a realistic weapon load out, you get to plan. Oh, and this is a combat simulator so you don't shrug off bullets and grenade explosions like Superman. You get hit or fragged, chances are, you die.

I agree with TotalBiscuit's conclusion - developers should abandon the single-player campaign, focus their efforts on the multiplayer and sell the game cheaper.

Thoughts?

Newsletters

You have been successfully signed up. To sign up for more newsletters or to manage your account, visit the Newsletter Subscription Center.
See All
See All