Attorney-General George Brandis has said that forcing internet service providers to retain customer data for up to two years for access by law enforcement agencies is under "active consideration" by the government, but it won't be rushing on it like the United Kingdom.
Theto force telecommunications companies to retain customer data for access by government agencies for law enforcement investigations.
The UK government brought on the legislation in reaction to a ruling by thethat the EU directive forcing data retention for between six months and two years was invalid because requiring the retention of the data directly interferes with those fundamental rights.
The last report from the Attorney-General's Department revealed that in Australia, a wide range of local, state, and federal government agencies accessed telecommunications customer data.
The data, which the government prefers to describe as "metadata", is a comprehensive history of the time, date, location, and recipient information about telephone calls, emails, and other communications. A warrant is not required to access the data because agencies argue that telecommunications customer data does not include content.
Government agenciesthat telecommunications companies should be required to store this data for up to two years, but a parliamentary committee report last year left the decision on data retention to the government.
As Brandis today announced the introduction of the first legislation created from the report,, he said that data retention was one matter under "active consideration."
"The question of data retention is under active consideration by the government. I might point out to you as recently as yesterday, the House of Commons passed a new data retention statute. This is very much the way in which western nations are going," he said.
As many as seven countries in Europe have ruled that data retention is unconstitutional. Brandis also pointed to the recently thrown out EU directive as evidence of the regime existing in other parts of the world, but said Australia was undecided at this stage.
"It has been the case in Europe under the European data retention directive for some little while now. It's not a decision Australia has yet made. It is not a matter that the Australian government has decided to do, but it is true to say it is under active consideration," he said.
under Freedom of Information revealed this week that the Attorney-General's Department is moving to distance any proposed data retention regime in Australia from the rejected EU directive, stating that there will be more privacy safeguards in place in the Australian setting.
Brandis said the government would not be rushed on national security legislation.
"The government has thought carefully and thoroughly about the recommendations of the committee. The public are entitled to be reassured that their government will put the security and safety of the Australian people foremost, but they're also entitled to be assured that in making policy choices and reforming laws, governments behave in a careful and considered manner, and not in a hasty or reactive manner," he said.
"We haven't approached this in a hasty way."
Head of Australia's peak intelligence agency, ASIO, David Irvine said that data retention was "absolutely crucial", but it would be held by the telcos, not ASIO.
"As there is increasing sophistications in communications, almost every ASIO investigation, and a very large number of law enforcement investigations depend at least on access to retained data [collected by telecommunications companies]," he said.
"We don't collect it and retain it ourselves."
The national security legislation, including data retention will likely have bipartisan support from Labor to get through parliament. Earlier this week former chair of the Joint Standing Committee on Intelligence and Security, Labor MP Anthony Byrne,to bring on similar data retention legislation before a terrorist attack occurs in Australia.
Opposition Leader Bill Shorten today also indicated that Labor would consider supporting data retention legislation provided that the Independent National Security Legislation Monitor was retained. The Coalition had originally planned to axe this position, but Brandis announced today that the role would be retained.
Additional national security legislation is expected to be brought to parliament in the Spring sittings, Brandis said.