Telstra says fibre to the node plans on hold

Summary:Telstra today confirmed the fibre to the node (FTTN) component of its Next Generation Network (NGN) would remain on hold after the government opted not to intervene to allow the carrier to restrict third-party access to its planned new infrastructure.

Telstra today confirmed the fibre to the node (FTTN) component of its Next Generation Network (NGN) would remain on hold after the government opted not to intervene to allow the carrier to restrict third-party access to its planned new infrastructure.

In a statement issued to the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX), Telstra said it would instead retain "various legacy elements of the copper access network" and had informed the vendors to which it had awarded NGN FTTN contracts of its intentions.

The carrier reiterated earlier statements that "regulations that will protect investment risk assumed by shareholders" were necessary for it to proceed with some parts of the NGN program, "particularly fibre to the node".

A spokesperson from Alcatel, which is providing much of the hardware for the FTTN network under a November memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Telstra, said the finalisation of the deal had always depended on favourable regulatory conditions. "Nothing's changed," the spokesperson said.

The spokesperson declined to reveal how much of Alcatel's AU$3.5 billion deal with Telstra related to the FTTN network.

Telstra said the decision meant earnings growth guidance for the fiscal year 2006 would improve by about four percent to a range of minus 15 to minus 20 percent without a restructuring and redundancy provision and minus 21 percent to minus 26 percent with a provision.

The move is designed to turn up the heat on the government over the carrier's demand for an access "holiday" to justify the proposed AU$3.1 billion spend on an FTTN that would cover around 87 percent of the Australian population.

The Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts, Senator Helen Coonan, told a conference on 14 December that the government would not legislate to give Telstra sole rights to use the proposed FTTN network.

Senator Coonan said certainty was achievable within the current telecommunications regulatory framework and said Telstra could apply for an exemption from the access regime before proceeding with its investment.

Telstra also said today it welcomed the government's reported resolution to seek further information from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission on proposals by the competition watchdog's for wholesale pricing arrangements for the so-called Unbundled Local Loop (ULL).

However, the ACCC subsequently upped the ante, with chairman Graeme Samuel publicly rejecting the carrier's proposed pricing for rivals to access the ULL -- the unconditioned cable, generally copper pairs, between end-users and a telephone exchange -- as "too high".

The ACCC said today it would inquire into the regulatory needs for fixed telecommunications services and wholesale services in light of technological change.

Telstra's move 'political'
According to analyst group International Data Corp, Telstra's announcement it would put a hold on its FTTN network was a political move.

"They're trying to push the government against the wall, and put as much pressure on the ACCC as they can," IDC's research director of telecommunications and consumer markets Landry Fevre told ZDNet Australia. "This is typical incumbent bargaining."

The analyst said consumers would be the losers out of the process.

"At the end of the day, Australian consumers will be in for less attractive services, because there'll be less competition, and the level of new product launches will be delayed," he said.

However Fevre considers it "inevitable" that Telstra upgrades its network. He pointed out competitors like Optus were currently doing the same and Telstra must eventually follow other telcos overseas and start offering ADSL2+, Voice over Internet Protocol and IPTV services

"The writing is on the wall. It's just a matter of time now," he said.

Telecommunications analyst Paul Budde called Telstra's move a "hollow threat" and said the heavyweight itself would be the biggest loser if it delayed upgrading its network.

"They have underinvested in their last mile/customer access network for over 15 years and they will not be able to deliver new services they need for new revenue streams unless they upgrade their network first."

"Further delays will also allow others to progress their own infrastructure developments independent from Telstra," he said.

Topics: Telcos, Banking, Mobility, Networking

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Related Stories

The best of ZDNet, delivered

You have been successfully signed up. To sign up for more newsletters or to manage your account, visit the Newsletter Subscription Center.
Subscription failed.