Australian government plans rapid content removal for social media

Australian government plans rapid content removal for social media

Summary: Large social networks would be required to remove content deemed to be bullying under a proposal put together by Parliamentary Secretary for Communications Paul Fletcher.

SHARE:

The Coalition government is moving ahead with plans to force large social media companies to remove content deemed to be bullying, or face the consequences.

Parliamentary Secretary for Communications Paul Fletcher this morning released a discussion paper on the establishment of the eSafety commissioner, as ZDNet foreshadowed earlier this month.

The release follows months of discussions with the industry and child welfare advocates, ZDNet understands, but the social networks remain pessimistic about the proposal, with one industry source telling ZDNet last year that they're concerned the government is at the whim of the far-right conservative group, the Australian Christian Lobby.

Fletcher's office would not confirm whether he had been meeting with the Australian Christian Lobby in regard to this matter, but said that members of child advocate groups such as Bravehearts, Child Wise, and Cybersafety Solutions had attended meetings on the proposal along with the likes of Telstra, Google, Facebook, Yahoo7, and Microsoft.

The discussion paper states that the government will appoint an independent Children's eSafety Commissioner through existing resources, which will have the power to enforce a "rapid removal" of content from large social media sites that is deemed to be harmful to children.

The commissioner could either exist as an independent statutory authority, as a non-government organisation, or be fulfilled by a member of the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA).

When the commissioner receives a complaint from a person under the age of 18, or their parent or guardian, the commissioner would then seek to determine whether it was "targeted at and likely to cause harm to an Australian child" before directing the social media site to remove it.

Fletcher told ZDNet that freedom of expression would be protected by limiting it to this specific clause.

"Protecting children must be balanced against freedom of speech on the internet. We have struck that balance by restricting the scheme's operation to content which is targeted at and harmful to a specific Australian child," he said in a statement.

The government said in the proposal that it would expect the cooperation of social media sites like Facebook and Twitter that choose to operate in Australia. Companies that fail to comply will be handed warnings, infringement notices, and ultimately injunctions and civil penalties.

Once the content is removed, an appeals process would be set up through the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, but the scheme would favour the interests of the child rather than the person who originally posted the content.

It comes as the Coalition government is set to repeal a section of the Racial Discrimination Act that made it unlawful to offend and insult people because of their race.

"You cannot have a situation in a liberal democracy in which the expression of an opinion is rendered unlawful because somebody else ... finds it offensive or insulting," Attorney-General Brandis said late last year.

Fletcher said he did not see the similarities between the two policies.

A spokesperson for the Australian Interactive Media Industry Association, which includes Microsoft, Yahoo7, Facebook, Freelancer, eBay, Google, and Twitter, said that the proposal is counter-productive.

"We share the Abbott government's commitment to keeping young Australians safe online, and we invest heavily in tools and infrastructure to achieve this. However, the government's proposal to legislate a one-size-fits-all regime is counter-productive to our own work and commitment to the safety of our customers," the spokesperson said.

One source within a social media company also told ZDNet that the proposal would be ineffective, because it would fail to capture other services such as Snapchat and WhatsApp, which are popular with younger users.

The policy was originally announced two days out from the 2013 federal election, along with mandatory opt-out internet filtering of all adult content. The Coalition backflipped on that policy five hours after ZDNet revealed the party's plans.

"Also, the creation of a new statutory body and new regulation on complaints handling seems at odds with the government's stated strategy to reduce regulation and to streamline government agencies."

The government is also seeking to amend the Criminal Code with specific cyberbullying offences targeted at people under 18, as well as a potential civil enforcement regime for people failing to remove and/or cease bullying children online. The penalty proposed would be an AU$1,000 fine.

Topics: Government, Government AU

About

Armed with a degree in Computer Science and a Masters in Journalism, Josh keeps a close eye on the telecommunications industry, the National Broadband Network, and all the goings on in government IT.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

4 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • The Biggest Bully is the Government itself

    Look at what they're doing.

    The chief lawyer said:
    "You cannot have a situation in a liberal democracy in which the expression of an opinion is rendered unlawful because somebody else ... finds it offensive or insulting."

    Isn't that what defamation laws are about? They protect the rich and powerful from being insulted by words they find offensive.

    So, the government has a double standard. It wants to protect the rich and powerful from insults, but at the same time it wants to take away laws that stop powerful extreme-right-wing media commentators from insulting aboriginal people about their aboriginality.

    The government is facilitating the very worst type of bullying.
    Vbitrate
    • Let us NEVR forget the Labor enquiry into the media

      that was designed to try to stop any criticism of Labor and the Left!
      1,2,3
    • a huge issue is coming, they anticipate riots soon (in a few years)

      The US government knows that these murders, surveillances, lies are not sustainable so has prepared concentrations camps for the US citizens when a bigger crisis comes:

      "
      Wordpress: Halliburton Confirms US Concentration Camps Ready to Detain up to 2 Million “Terrorists”.
      "
      Jiří Pavelec
  • Government at the whim of the ACL Christian Lobby

    There is a coffee shop chain called Gloria Jeans.

    Gloria Jeans has been funding the ACL Christian Lobby.

    See ABC News report (I include that just for verification):
    http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2012/06/13/3524390.htm

    Facebook and the other social networks have been hosting web pages that want to boycott Gloria Jeans for its links to the ACL Christian Lobby.

    So now the ACL Christian Lobby seems to want to to censor the social networks (according to the social networks cited in the ZDNet article).
    Vbitrate