BYO iPads not the best medicine for St Vincent's Hospital
Summary: St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, is dipping its toes in BYOD, but conflicts with Microsoft and Apple compatibility will make it tough.
As St Vincent's Hospital in Melbourne completes a major overhaul of its virtual desktop infrastructure, the hospital's IT division has said it is difficult to get many of its applications to work on tablets and smartphones.

(Image: Josh Taylor/ZDNet)
St Vincent's Hospital in Melbourne has three sites, with 5,000 staff members and 800 beds. In addition to emergency care, the hospital also has an aged care facility, a hospice, and a number of satellite clinics for community care.
The hospital's IT division is set to link up and become part of a national IT group with other St Vincent's hospitals down the track, but the Melbourne hospital still has local governance under the direction of recently appointed CIO Simon Richardson.
Like many other organisations, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, has been considering rolling out a bring-your-own-devices (BYOD) model, including tablets and smartphones, but according to Paul Gladwell, St Vincent's IT strategy manager, it's difficult to get all the applications working on iPads.
"We're just dipping our toes into BYO devices and tablets and iPhones and things like that. We have that challenge of having a mostly Microsoft shop and trying to get access by mostly Apple devices, and it is rendering that is the challenge and how it looks," he said.
"You can get on to what you want to do via a secure network, but it is actually how it looks when you do it. If [staff members are] wanting to browse, it's not too bad via the iPads, but trying to do any form of clinical data entry is where the challenge [lies]," he said.
Part of the reason for this, he said, is that it's not just one system that staff needs to access; there are about 30 or 40 different applications.

(Image: Josh Taylor/ZDNet)
The organisation has 95 percent completed an upgrade of its 600 desktops and computers on wheels (COWs) stationed around the hospital that are used by medical staff to access patient information. The hospital uses Cisco's unified computing system for the virtualised desktops, with the use of Microsoft Remote Desktop Services. The desktops are running Windows 7.
Gladwell said the new Quick Connect system allows staff members to tap on to their virtualised desktop anywhere in the hospital, and load it up to where that staff member left it within two to three seconds, where before it could take up to five minutes.
"There was such a stigma attached to their slowness. The fact that they were having to log on and log off, there was a hesitancy to use those PCs," he said.
But now he said the Quick Connect system has increased the utilisation of the hospital's IT infrastructure, with more staff willing to use the desktops in different parts of the hospital. But he said that the IT division first had to get staff to buy in to the switchover, and trade in their old ID cards for the new near-field communication (NFC) cards.
"We had to convince everybody that they needed to change their old swipe card, which was just a metallic strip card, to a new proximity-based card," he said. "So there was basically a random draw for an iPad.
"[We saw] pretty quick take-up."
E-Health system lacks compatibility
Just over two years ago, the hospital went to market and began implementing a new document-collection system that would scan in patient documents from paper as they were written up. Since going live 14 months ago, the hospital has collected 2.2 million documents, 90,000 progress notes, 29,000 ICU documents, and over 200 emergency department notes.
But despite the investment in e-health, the hospital has gone out to tender for another clinical system that will be compatible with the federal government's close to AU$1 billion personally controlled e-health record (PCEHR) system.
"That clinical system will be doing the integration. We decided not to develop in any other periphery systems at the moment," Richardson said.
The plan will be for the document system to sit alongside the clinical system that is compatible with the national e-health record system.
"We are actually creating electronic data now, but that will be superseded by our clinical platform," Richardson said.
Richardson later clarified to ZDNet that the electronic data will be compatible with the PCEHR platform.
Josh Taylor travelled to Melbourne as a guest of Cisco.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
Yep
BYOD in healthcare is a VIOLATION of HIPPA
It is a direct violation of HIPAA without a single real benefit to anybody.
HIPAA is American
Something has to be better and more intuitive if not at least useable
iPad is a toy, not suited for workplace
It took decades for Microsoft and other enterprise players to build software that matters for enterprise. Silly android tablets and iPads has no place in Enterprise.
Prepare the Apps
I dont believe that buying a whole heap of Surfaces will suit their requirements as the adoption of the Surface is WOEFUL and this would further attach their star to the dying M$ platform. I also dont believe that telling users that they can't do things that every other organisation is doing is a correct course of action, if users have any choice they will migrate to other hospitals or states where their user satisfaction is highest and there is a chronic shortage of medical staff between sates in Australia.
The hospital needs to get the committees that govern their applications to start walking those application towards a platform independent mobile future....this has to be built into the applications lifecycle.....it may take years, sorry guys this depends on $, commitment, and common standards.... and for GO SAKE don't use virtualised versions of M$ products that just feeds the beast. Avoid them if you can. If you don't make this change there is a whole generation of employees at University now who are using mobile devices most based on IOS, who won't want to come and work at your hospital because you use old clunky technology that isn't the platform they are used to, and isn't what they want to use. Your systems are the face of your organisational nervous system, don't make people think that your hospital is outdated just because your systems are and try and have some forward thinking and planning in your systems lifecycle and use those common standards.
iOS
Windows 8's slow adoption is due to Microsoft not providing tuition early on. Most people making videos on YouTube are clueless and are making it look clumsy and bad. It's the fastest and quickest to navigate Windows there has ever been if you actually know how to use it "properly".
Brain Dead
REMOTE DESKTOPS ONE SOLUTION
@TASPOLKILLER
Saying that MS' Windows is a dying platform is just so far off the mark. Take a look at the latest results from NetMarketShare that show Desktop OSs in order of preference and you'll find that they are Windows7, Windows XP,Windows Vista, Windows 8 and then the MAC OSs. Yes Windows 8 is more popular than the most popular Mac OS, OS X 10.8.
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=10&qpcustomd=0
You need to sit down and maybe have a cup of tea, calm down and then accept the fact that your whole rave was really just your dreams said out loud. MS is not my favourite company either but they wil definitely be here, and in charge of the desktop and enterprise for years to come and, as a result, simple logic says that BYOD will probably always be easier to implement and work best with Windows 8 Pro tablets.
There is simply no argument.
IOS
Hello... its called "Surface PRO"
Everyone has bagged Microsoft for the Surface, but its aiblity to easily interface with business proprietry systems running in Windows Desktop on a phone or tablet will prove to be the turning point.
I have seen a number of companies try to use iPads, and beyond email they are pretty much door stops without custom built software.