Australia sets date for Google keyword case

Australia sets date for Google keyword case

Summary: The Australian competition regulator's allegations of misleading and deceptive advertising practices by Google will be heard in June

TOPICS: Networking

The Australian Federal Court has set a hearing date for the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's allegations against Google of misleading and deceptive conduct.

Last Friday, Justice James Allsop set a hearing date of 23 June for the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's (ACCC) case against Google to be heard in the Federal Court.

Friday's court date allowed the ACCC to resubmit its case against Google after Justice Allsop was unable to understand the ACCC's initial submission, which he called "incomprehensible" and "repetitious".

Google is accused of inadequately distinguishing between its sponsored links and the normal "organic" search results its engine produces.

The ACCC's initial statement of claim was against Google and its subsidiaries, Google Australia and Google Ireland. However, it dropped allegations against the subsidiaries after Google said that any orders against it would be applied to its subsidiaries.

Separate allegations of deceptive and misleading advertising were first levelled against Google and Australian website Trading Post's parent company, Sensis, in July after the Trading Post was found to have purchased Google keywords using competitors' business names which were displayed on Google's sponsored links.

Google Australia has defended its sponsored link advertising practices, claiming the ACCC's allegations are an attack on all search engines and Australian businesses that use Google to connect with customers.

"The ACCC's claims against Google are entirely without merit and we will continue to defend against them vigorously. We're very much looking forward to making our arguments to the court," said Google Australia's spokesperson.

Sensis Australia meanwhile has said it is seeking to settle with the ACCC out of court.

The ACCC's allegations against the Trading Post centre on its use of the business names "Kloster Ford" and "Charlestown Toyota", which appeared in the title of Google sponsored links to the Trading Post's website in 2005.

Sensis was employing third-party search-engine marketing companies to select keywords for use on Google's sponsored links, which appear at the top and side panel of not-paid-for "organic" search results, said a spokesperson for Sensis.

Read this


Comment: The flaw in the Google Android plan

Can Google be a partner to mobile-phone makers? Only if the company can force itself to beg, beguile and bluff, says CNET's Michael Kanellos

Read more

"We're bringing that in-house, rather than using third-party agencies and we're setting up rigorous processes when keywords are purchased. As a result of that and working through the details for the ACCC case, we are exploring some new possibilities with the ACCC," the spokesperson told ZDNet Australia.

"We are pleased to be exploring the possibility of settling the matter with the ACCC, but, as the matter is still before the court, we don't wish to elaborate further," The spokesperson said.

A spokesperson for the ACCC would not confirm whether it would be settling with Sensis.

Topic: Networking

Liam Tung

About Liam Tung

Liam Tung is an Australian business technology journalist living a few too many Swedish miles north of Stockholm for his liking. He gained a bachelors degree in economics and arts (cultural studies) at Sydney's Macquarie University, but hacked (without Norse or malicious code for that matter) his way into a career as an enterprise tech, security and telecommunications journalist with ZDNet Australia. These days Liam is a full time freelance technology journalist who writes for several publications.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to start the discussion