Berners-Lee says no to internet 'snooping'

Berners-Lee says no to internet 'snooping'

Summary: The inventor of the World Wide Web has criticised internet service providers and third parties that intercept web traffic

TOPICS: Security

The inventor of the World Wide Web, Sir Tim Berners-Lee, has attacked deep packet inspection, a technique used to monitor traffic on the internet and other communications networks.

Speaking at a House of Lords event on the 20th anniversary of the invention of the World Wide Web, Berners-Lee said that deep packet inspection was the electronic equivalent of opening people's mail.

"This is very important to me, as what is at stake is the integrity of the internet as a communications medium," Berners-Lee said on Wednesday. "Clearly we must not interfere with the internet, and we must not snoop on the internet. If we snoop on clicks and data, we can find out a lot more information about people than if we listen to their conversations."

Deep packet inspection involves examining both the data and the header of an information packet as it passes a 'black box' on a network, in order to reveal the content of the communication. Targeted advertising services, such as Phorm in the UK, use deep packet inspection to monitor anonymised user behaviour and to target adverts at those users. In addition, UK government initiatives such as the Intercept Modernisation Programme have proposed using deep packet inspection to perform mass surveillance of the web comunications of the entire UK population.

Speaking to ZDNet UK at the event, Berners-Lee declined to comment about any particular company or government initiative, but said that internet service providers (ISPs) should not perform deep packet inspection.

"If [third parties] are using the data for political ends or commercial interest, there we have to draw the line," Berners-Lee said. "There's a gap between running a successful internet service and looking inside data packets."

Berners-Lee expressed concern that the UK government had taken no action over deep packet inspection, in contrast to the US government's response to the use of deep packet inspection by targeted advertising company NebuAd. Last autumn, the US Congress decided to review privacy concerns around the start-up, after which the company's chief executive, Bob Dykes, stepped down.

"I'm embarrassed, as a UK citizen and as a US resident, that the US has drawn a line firmly against deep packet inspection and this country hasn't," Berners-Lee said.

Nicholas Bohm, the general counsel for the Foundation for Information Policy Research (FIPR), said the UK government may not have taken any action over deep packet inspection as it was in the process of developing the Intercept Modernisation Programme itself. "The government's desire to know all about us may be hampering its doing anything about others who are snooping," he said.

Kent Ertugrul, the chief executive of Phorm, said his company had ensured that privacy principles are adhered to by anonymising the data it collects, while at the same time giving websites the ability to fine-hone their advertising. "We have created something that reconciles the need for privacy, but also for commerce," said Ertugrul.

Prominent cross-bench peer Lord Erroll said deep packet inspection to target adverts did not concern him as much as the UK government's plans.

"The Intercept Modernisation Programme worries me hugely more than [targeted advertising]," said Erroll. "The impact of an incorrect interpretation of communications by government means anyone could end up in jail, or worse. It's hugely dangerous."

Topic: Security

Tom Espiner

About Tom Espiner

Tom is a technology reporter for He covers the security beat, writing about everything from hacking and cybercrime to threats and mitigation. He also focuses on open source and emerging technologies, all the while trying to cut through greenwash.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Protect myself

    And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why, when the Government decides it's okay to spy on us, I shall be using a proxy set-up via ssh to a server in the US. SSH is encrypted, so let them crack those packets to "deep inspect" them. :P

    I'll also be starting to use PGP more for my emails, even non-vital ones.

    Not until the government realises those who would seek to get by their filters can, and they call off their own DPI, will I relax my security.
  • Snooping

    I'm going one better, I only use www at work now and when I retire next year I will never have to use the internet again, ever. I don't need it. When HMs gov. decides to record all telepone message, is the day I give up my phone. I don't need a phone.
  • escaping

    ha! I'll see your internet withdrawal & raise you! I'm heading out of this country as soon as possible!
    Now, anyone know of any countries that are a little more reasonable...?
  • Better country

    Head to Sweden!

    Seriously, they have the best record at social liberty, as proven by the fact that The Pirate Bay is being allowed to continue to exist (well.... that's the expected outcome of the trial, which had no evidence, anyway)

    So yeah, head to Sweden.
  • NEW and Revolutionary Virtually Hack-Free Communication Protocol!


    When it really looks bleak, I would advise you all to move your personal comms to an amazing, new communications technology that will serve your needs. It requires a very small amount of fuel and is extremely simple to operate. To some degree, it even thinks for itself : The pigeon!


    "If [third parties] are using the data for political ends or commercial interest, there we have to draw the line," Berners-Lee said. "There's a gap between running a successful internet service and looking inside data packets."
    This is just so very little what he states.
    Just so very little.